summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAthira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2023-01-31 19:20:01 +0530
committerArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>2023-02-06 11:40:59 -0300
commitee739f132f716f28c9fbe70a230e35085c197dd5 (patch)
tree45e582e4a7322f5a917a70f3eb1681a898cf6c10 /tools/perf
parentab809efaeba0cca20cfcda23852b0ee958f6ea69 (diff)
perf test bpf: Check for libtraceevent support
The "bpf" tests fails in environment with missing libtraceevent support as below: # ./perf test 36 36: BPF filter : 36.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED! 36.2: BPF pinning : FAILED! 36.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED! The environment has clang but missing the libtraceevent devel. Hence perf is compiled without libtraceevent support. Detailed logs: ./perf test -v "Basic BPF filtering" Failed to add BPF event syscalls:sys_enter_epoll_pwait bpf: tracepoint call back failed, stop iterate Failed to add events selected by BPF The bpf tests tris to add probe event which fails at "parse_events_add_tracepoint" function due to missing libtraceevent. Add check for "HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" in the "tests/bpf.c" before proceeding with the test. With the change, # ./perf test 36 36: BPF filter : 36.1: Basic BPF filtering : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support) 36.2: BPF pinning : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support) 36.3: BPF prologue generation : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support) Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131135001.54578-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf')
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/tests/bpf.c22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 17c023823713..4af39528f611 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#define NR_ITERS 111
#define PERF_TEST_BPF_PATH "/sys/fs/bpf/perf_test"
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
@@ -330,10 +330,10 @@ static int test__bpf(int i)
static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
return test__bpf(0);
#else
- pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+ pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
#endif
}
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
return test__bpf(1);
#else
- pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+ pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
#endif
}
@@ -352,17 +352,17 @@ static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
static int test__bpf_prologue_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
-#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE)
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
return test__bpf(2);
#else
- pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+ pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n");
return TEST_SKIP;
#endif
}
static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
TEST_CASE("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test),
TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning,
"clang isn't installed or environment missing BPF support"),
@@ -373,9 +373,9 @@ static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
#endif
#else
- TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in"),
- TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in"),
- TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
+ TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"),
+ TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"),
+ TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"),
#endif
{ .name = NULL, }
};