diff options
author | Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2023-01-31 19:20:01 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2023-02-06 11:40:59 -0300 |
commit | ee739f132f716f28c9fbe70a230e35085c197dd5 (patch) | |
tree | 45e582e4a7322f5a917a70f3eb1681a898cf6c10 /tools | |
parent | ab809efaeba0cca20cfcda23852b0ee958f6ea69 (diff) |
perf test bpf: Check for libtraceevent support
The "bpf" tests fails in environment with missing libtraceevent support
as below:
# ./perf test 36
36: BPF filter :
36.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
36.2: BPF pinning : FAILED!
36.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
The environment has clang but missing the libtraceevent devel. Hence
perf is compiled without libtraceevent support.
Detailed logs:
./perf test -v "Basic BPF filtering"
Failed to add BPF event syscalls:sys_enter_epoll_pwait
bpf: tracepoint call back failed, stop iterate
Failed to add events selected by BPF
The bpf tests tris to add probe event which fails at
"parse_events_add_tracepoint" function due to missing libtraceevent. Add
check for "HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" in the "tests/bpf.c" before proceeding
with the test.
With the change,
# ./perf test 36
36: BPF filter :
36.1: Basic BPF filtering : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
36.2: BPF pinning : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
36.3: BPF prologue generation : Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131135001.54578-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c index 17c023823713..4af39528f611 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ #define NR_ITERS 111 #define PERF_TEST_BPF_PATH "/sys/fs/bpf/perf_test" -#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT) #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <bpf/bpf.h> @@ -330,10 +330,10 @@ static int test__bpf(int i) static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused) { -#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT) return test__bpf(0); #else - pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n"); + pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n"); return TEST_SKIP; #endif } @@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused) { -#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT) return test__bpf(1); #else - pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n"); + pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n"); return TEST_SKIP; #endif } @@ -352,17 +352,17 @@ static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, static int test__bpf_prologue_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused) { -#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE) +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT) return test__bpf(2); #else - pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n"); + pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not compiled\n"); return TEST_SKIP; #endif } static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = { -#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT) TEST_CASE("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test), TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "clang isn't installed or environment missing BPF support"), @@ -373,9 +373,9 @@ static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = { TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"), #endif #else - TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in"), - TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in"), - TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"), + TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"), + TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"), + TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support"), #endif { .name = NULL, } }; |