summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rust/uapi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-10-22nova: add initial driver stubHEADnova-nextDanilo Krummrich
Add the initial driver stub of Nova, a Rust-based GSP-only driver for Nvidia GPUs. Nova, in the long term, is intended to serve as the successor of Nouveau for GSP-firmware-based GPUs. [1] As a stub driver Nova's focus is to make use of the most basic device / driver infrastructure required to build a DRM driver on the PCI bus and serve as demonstration example and justification for this infrastructure. In further consequence, the idea is to develop Nova continuously upstream, using those increments to lift further Rust abstractions and infrastructure upstream. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/Zfsj0_tb-0-tNrJy@cassiopeiae/T/#u [1] Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
2024-10-22rust: drm: ioctl: Add DRM ioctl abstractionAsahi Lina
DRM drivers need to be able to declare which driver-specific ioctls they support. Add an abstraction implementing the required types and a helper macro to generate the ioctl definition inside the DRM driver. Note that this macro is not usable until further bits of the abstraction are in place (but it will not fail to compile on its own, if not called). Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lintMiguel Ojeda
Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe` blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1]. Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0, Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2]. Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already. Thus enable the lint now. We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for new contributors. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-30rust: net::phy unified read/write API for C22 and C45 registersFUJITA Tomonori
Add the unified read/write API for C22 and C45 registers. The abstractions support access to only C22 registers now. Instead of adding read/write_c45 methods specifically for C45, a new reg module supports the unified API to access C22 and C45 registers with trait, by calling an appropriate phylib functions. Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2024-07-10rust: allow `dead_code` for never constructed bindingsMiguel Ojeda
Starting with the upcoming Rust 1.80.0 (since upstream commit 35130d7233e9 ("Detect pub structs never constructed and unused associated constants in traits")), the `dead_code` pass detects more cases, which triggers in the `bindings` crate: warning: struct `boot_params` is never constructed --> rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs:10684:12 | 10684 | pub struct boot_params { | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default As well as in the `uapi` one: warning: struct `boot_params` is never constructed --> rust/uapi/uapi_generated.rs:10392:12 | 10392 | pub struct boot_params { | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default These are all expected, since we do not use all the structs in the bindings that `bindgen` generates from the C headers. Therefore, allow them. Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Reviewed-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev> Tested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709160615.998336-4-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2023-12-15net: phy: add Rust Asix PHY driverFUJITA Tomonori
This is the Rust implementation of drivers/net/phy/ax88796b.c. The features are equivalent. You can choose C or Rust version kernel configuration. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-05-31rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2Miguel Ojeda
This is the first upgrade to the Rust toolchain since the initial Rust merge, from 1.62.0 to 1.68.2 (i.e. the latest). # Context The kernel currently supports only a single Rust version [1] (rather than a minimum) given our usage of some "unstable" Rust features [2] which do not promise backwards compatibility. The goal is to reach a point where we can declare a minimum version for the toolchain. For instance, by waiting for some of the features to be stabilized. Therefore, the first minimum Rust version that the kernel will support is "in the future". # Upgrade policy Given we will eventually need to reach that minimum version, it would be ideal to upgrade the compiler from time to time to be as close as possible to that goal and find any issues sooner. In the extreme, we could upgrade as soon as a new Rust release is out. Of course, upgrading so often is in stark contrast to what one normally would need for GCC and LLVM, especially given the release schedule: 6 weeks for Rust vs. half a year for LLVM and a year for GCC. Having said that, there is no particular advantage to updating slowly either: kernel developers in "stable" distributions are unlikely to be able to use their distribution-provided Rust toolchain for the kernel anyway [3]. Instead, by routinely upgrading to the latest instead, kernel developers using Linux distributions that track the latest Rust release may be able to use those rather than Rust-provided ones, especially if their package manager allows to pin / hold back / downgrade the version for some days during windows where the version may not match. For instance, Arch, Fedora, Gentoo and openSUSE all provide and track the latest version of Rust as they get released every 6 weeks. Then, when the minimum version is reached, we will stop upgrading and decide how wide the window of support will be. For instance, a year of Rust versions. We will probably want to start small, and then widen it over time, just like the kernel did originally for LLVM, see commit 3519c4d6e08e ("Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version"). # Unstable features stabilized This upgrade allows us to remove the following unstable features since they were stabilized: - `feature(explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait)` (1.63). - `feature(core_ffi_c)` (1.64). - `feature(generic_associated_types)` (1.65). - `feature(const_ptr_offset_from)` (1.65, *). - `feature(bench_black_box)` (1.66, *). - `feature(pin_macro)` (1.68). The ones marked with `*` apply only to our old `rust` branch, not mainline yet, i.e. only for code that we may potentially upstream. With this patch applied, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [2] for details. # Other required changes Since 1.63, `rustdoc` triggers the `broken_intra_doc_links` lint for links pointing to exported (`#[macro_export]`) `macro_rules`. An issue was opened upstream [4], but it turns out it is intended behavior. For the moment, just add an explicit reference for each link. Later we can revisit this if `rustdoc` removes the compatibility measure. Nevertheless, this was helpful to discover a link that was pointing to the wrong place unintentionally. Since that one was actually wrong, it is fixed in a previous commit independently. Another change was the addition of `cfg(no_rc)` and `cfg(no_sync)` in upstream [5], thus remove our original changes for that. Similarly, upstream now tests that it compiles successfully with `#[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]` [6], which allow us to get rid of some changes, such as an `#[allow(dead_code)]`. In addition, remove another `#[allow(dead_code)]` due to new uses within the standard library. Finally, add `try_extend_trusted` and move the code in `spec_extend.rs` since upstream moved it for the infallible version. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing There are a large amount of changes, but the vast majority of them are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [1] Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/2 [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72mT3bVDKdHgaea-6WiZazd8Mvurqmqegbe5JZxVyLR8Yg@mail.gmail.com/ [3] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106142 [4] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89891 [5] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98652 [6] Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-By: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Tested-by: Ariel Miculas <amiculas@cisco.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418214347.324156-4-ojeda@kernel.org [ Removed `feature(core_ffi_c)` from `uapi` ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2023-04-22rust: uapi: Add UAPI crateAsahi Lina
This crate mirrors the `bindings` crate, but will contain only UAPI bindings. Unlike the bindings crate, drivers may directly use this crate if they have to interface with userspace. Initially, just bind the generic ioctl stuff. In the future, we would also like to add additional checks to ensure that all types exposed by this crate satisfy UAPI-safety guarantees (that is, they are safely castable to/from a "bag of bits"). [ Miguel: added support for the `rustdoc` and `rusttest` targets, since otherwise they fail, and we want to keep them working. ] Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329-rust-uapi-v2-1-bca5fb4d4a12@asahilina.net Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>