summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/selinux/xfrm.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>2018-03-05 11:47:56 -0500
committerPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>2018-03-20 16:58:17 -0400
commit6b6bc6205d98796361962ee282a063f18ba8dc57 (patch)
treeb9e6f6492606000e1d8826b4eb2c882726c61722 /security/selinux/xfrm.c
parent0619f0f5e36f12e100ef294f5980cfe7c93ff23e (diff)
selinux: wrap AVC state
Wrap the AVC state within the selinux_state structure and pass it explicitly to all AVC functions. The AVC private state is encapsulated in a selinux_avc structure that is referenced from the selinux_state. This change should have no effect on SELinux behavior or APIs (userspace or LSM). Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/selinux/xfrm.c')
-rw-r--r--security/selinux/xfrm.c17
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index a5ac27de571f..91dc3783ed94 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
if (rc)
goto err;
- rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+ rc = avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
+ tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL);
if (rc)
goto err;
@@ -142,7 +143,8 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_delete(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
if (!ctx)
return 0;
- return avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+ return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
+ tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT,
NULL);
}
@@ -164,7 +166,8 @@ int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir)
if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
return -EINVAL;
- rc = avc_has_perm(fl_secid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+ rc = avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
+ fl_secid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__POLMATCH, NULL);
return (rc == -EACCES ? -ESRCH : rc);
}
@@ -203,7 +206,8 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
/* We don't need a separate SA Vs. policy polmatch check since the SA
* is now of the same label as the flow and a flow Vs. policy polmatch
* check had already happened in selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() above. */
- return (avc_has_perm(fl->flowi_secid, state_sid,
+ return (avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
+ fl->flowi_secid, state_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO,
NULL) ? 0 : 1);
}
@@ -422,7 +426,8 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
* according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
* non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
- return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, peer_sid,
+ return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
+ sk_sid, peer_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
}
@@ -465,6 +470,6 @@ int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
* according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
* non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
- return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED,
+ return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state, sk_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
}