diff options
| author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2018-03-12 19:21:38 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> | 2018-03-20 13:41:38 +0100 |
| commit | 1446385904add0e89f990ee0518434365e50ce86 (patch) | |
| tree | 109422533e9bed9f96aff480f543745ddd51f180 /net/netfilter | |
| parent | 8039ab43eeac029a9c47c0411918ea82c9ce87cd (diff) | |
netfilter: nfnetlink_cthelper: Remove VLA usage
In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA and replace it
with dynamic memory allocation.
>From a security viewpoint, the use of Variable Length Arrays can be
a vector for stack overflow attacks. Also, in general, as the code
evolves it is easy to lose track of how big a VLA can get. Thus, we
can end up having segfaults that are hard to debug.
Also, fixed as part of the directive to remove all VLAs from
the kernel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/netfilter')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c index d33ce6d5ebce..4a4b293fb2e5 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c @@ -314,23 +314,30 @@ nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(const struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *policy, static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_all(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper) { - struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy new_policy[helper->expect_class_max + 1]; + struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *new_policy; struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *policy; - int i, err; + int i, ret = 0; + + new_policy = kmalloc_array(helper->expect_class_max + 1, + sizeof(*new_policy), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!new_policy) + return -ENOMEM; /* Check first that all policy attributes are well-formed, so we don't * leave things in inconsistent state on errors. */ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) { - if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i]) - return -EINVAL; + if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i]) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto err; + } - err = nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(&helper->expect_policy[i], + ret = nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_one(&helper->expect_policy[i], &new_policy[i], tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET + i]); - if (err < 0) - return err; + if (ret < 0) + goto err; } /* Now we can safely update them. */ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) { @@ -340,7 +347,9 @@ static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy_all(struct nlattr *tb[], policy->timeout = new_policy->timeout; } - return 0; +err: + kfree(new_policy); + return ret; } static int nfnl_cthelper_update_policy(struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper, |