summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2020-12-04 07:48:11 -0800
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2020-12-04 07:48:12 -0800
commita1dd1d86973182458da7798a95f26cfcbea599b4 (patch)
tree1adda22ea30ccfac7651a7eed7b7c90356f8243a /net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
parent55fd59b003f6e8fd88cf16590e79823d7ccf3026 (diff)
parenteceae70bdeaeb6b8ceb662983cf663ff352fbc96 (diff)
Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-12-03 The main changes are: 1) Support BTF in kernel modules, from Andrii. 2) Introduce preferred busy-polling, from Björn. 3) bpf_ima_inode_hash() and bpf_bprm_opts_set() helpers, from KP Singh. 4) Memcg-based memory accounting for bpf objects, from Roman. 5) Allow bpf_{s,g}etsockopt from cgroup bind{4,6} hooks, from Stanislav. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (118 commits) selftests/bpf: Fix invalid use of strncat in test_sockmap libbpf: Use memcpy instead of strncpy to please GCC selftests/bpf: Add fentry/fexit/fmod_ret selftest for kernel module selftests/bpf: Add tp_btf CO-RE reloc test for modules libbpf: Support attachment of BPF tracing programs to kernel modules libbpf: Factor out low-level BPF program loading helper bpf: Allow to specify kernel module BTFs when attaching BPF programs bpf: Remove hard-coded btf_vmlinux assumption from BPF verifier selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocs selftest relying on kernel module BTF selftests/bpf: Add support for marking sub-tests as skipped selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing libbpf: Add kernel module BTF support for CO-RE relocations libbpf: Refactor CO-RE relocs to not assume a single BTF object libbpf: Add internal helper to load BTF data by FD bpf: Keep module's btf_data_size intact after load bpf: Fix bpf_put_raw_tracepoint()'s use of __module_address() selftests/bpf: Add Userspace tests for TCP_WINDOW_CLAMP bpf: Adds support for setting window clamp samples/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "recieving" -> "receiving" bpf: Fix cold build of test_progs-no_alu32 ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204021936.85653-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c')
-rw-r--r--net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index 359908a7d3c1..a32037daa933 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static bool bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
void *, value, u64, flags)
{
- if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+ if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
return (unsigned long)NULL;
return (unsigned long)____bpf_sk_storage_get(map, sk, value, flags);
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map,
struct sock *, sk)
{
- if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+ if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
return -EPERM;
return ____bpf_sk_storage_delete(map, sk);