diff options
| author | Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 2024-03-08 15:28:27 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> | 2024-03-13 11:39:27 -0700 |
| commit | 51b30ecb73b481d5fac6ccf2ecb4a309c9ee3310 (patch) | |
| tree | 3c327ed3c45e260a8012c83117cebca0a4757ef1 /kernel | |
| parent | cbf53074a528191df82b4dba1e3d21191102255e (diff) | |
swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present
Nicolin reports that swiotlb buffer allocations fail for an NVME device
behind an IOMMU using 64KiB pages. This is because we end up with a
minimum allocation alignment of 64KiB (for the IOMMU to map the buffer
safely) but a minimum DMA alignment mask corresponding to a 4KiB NVME
page (i.e. preserving the 4KiB page offset from the original allocation).
If the original address is not 4KiB-aligned, the allocation will fail
because swiotlb_search_pool_area() erroneously compares these unmasked
bits with the 64KiB-aligned candidate allocation.
Tweak swiotlb_search_pool_area() so that the DMA alignment mask is
reduced based on the required alignment of the allocation.
Fixes: 82612d66d51d ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1707851466.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com
Reported-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index a3645a9ae68e..f212943e51ca 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -1003,8 +1003,7 @@ static int swiotlb_search_pool_area(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr = phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, pool->start) & boundary_mask; unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask); - unsigned int iotlb_align_mask = - dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1); + unsigned int iotlb_align_mask = dma_get_min_align_mask(dev); unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride; unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr); unsigned int index, slots_checked, count = 0, i; @@ -1016,6 +1015,14 @@ static int swiotlb_search_pool_area(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool BUG_ON(area_index >= pool->nareas); /* + * Ensure that the allocation is at least slot-aligned and update + * 'iotlb_align_mask' to ignore bits that will be preserved when + * offsetting into the allocation. + */ + alloc_align_mask |= (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1); + iotlb_align_mask &= ~alloc_align_mask; + + /* * For mappings with an alignment requirement don't bother looping to * unaligned slots once we found an aligned one. */ |