diff options
author | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2024-08-09 12:02:58 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2024-08-14 12:28:24 -0400 |
commit | 66155de93bcf4f2967e602a4b3bf7ebe58f34b11 (patch) | |
tree | adb539a39f7a1d5b106f74fb7920c417448bafe4 /include | |
parent | c9b35a6f4edea698a5bb4dd8029e7104ee0a3726 (diff) |
KVM: x86: Disallow read-only memslots for SEV-ES and SEV-SNP (and TDX)
Disallow read-only memslots for SEV-{ES,SNP} VM types, as KVM can't
directly emulate instructions for ES/SNP, and instead the guest must
explicitly request emulation. Unless the guest explicitly requests
emulation without accessing memory, ES/SNP relies on KVM creating an MMIO
SPTE, with the subsequent #NPF being reflected into the guest as a #VC.
But for read-only memslots, KVM deliberately doesn't create MMIO SPTEs,
because except for ES/SNP, doing so requires setting reserved bits in the
SPTE, i.e. the SPTE can't be readable while also generating a #VC on
writes. Because KVM never creates MMIO SPTEs and jumps directly to
emulation, the guest never gets a #VC. And since KVM simply resumes the
guest if ES/SNP guests trigger emulation, KVM effectively puts the vCPU
into an infinite #NPF loop if the vCPU attempts to write read-only memory.
Disallow read-only memory for all VMs with protected state, i.e. for
upcoming TDX VMs as well as ES/SNP VMs. For TDX, it's actually possible
to support read-only memory, as TDX uses EPT Violation #VE to reflect the
fault into the guest, e.g. KVM could configure read-only SPTEs with RX
protections and SUPPRESS_VE=0. But there is no strong use case for
supporting read-only memslots on TDX, e.g. the main historical usage is
to emulate option ROMs, but TDX disallows executing from shared memory.
And if someone comes along with a legitimate, strong use case, the
restriction can always be lifted for TDX.
Don't bother trying to retroactively apply the restriction to SEV-ES
VMs that are created as type KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM. Read-only memslots can't
possibly work for SEV-ES, i.e. disallowing such memslots is really just
means reporting an error to userspace instead of silently hanging vCPUs.
Trying to deal with the ordering between KVM_SEV_INIT and memslot creation
isn't worth the marginal benefit it would provide userspace.
Fixes: 26c44aa9e076 ("KVM: SEV: define VM types for SEV and SEV-ES")
Fixes: 1dfe571c12cf ("KVM: SEV: Add initial SEV-SNP support")
Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Cc: Ackerly Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20240809190319.1710470-2-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h index 79a6b1a63027..b23c6d48392f 100644 --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -715,6 +715,13 @@ static inline bool kvm_arch_has_private_mem(struct kvm *kvm) } #endif +#ifndef kvm_arch_has_readonly_mem +static inline bool kvm_arch_has_readonly_mem(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_READONLY_MEM); +} +#endif + struct kvm_memslots { u64 generation; atomic_long_t last_used_slot; |