bpf,lsm: Refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free LSM hooks

Based on upstream discussion ([0]), rework existing
bpf_prog_alloc_security LSM hook. Rename it to bpf_prog_load and instead
of passing bpf_prog_aux, pass proper bpf_prog pointer for a full BPF
program struct. Also, we pass bpf_attr union with all the user-provided
arguments for BPF_PROG_LOAD command.  This will give LSMs as much
information as we can basically provide.

The hook is also BPF token-aware now, and optional bpf_token struct is
passed as a third argument. bpf_prog_load LSM hook is called after
a bunch of sanity checks were performed, bpf_prog and bpf_prog_aux were
allocated and filled out, but right before performing full-fledged BPF
verification step.

bpf_prog_free LSM hook is now accepting struct bpf_prog argument, for
consistency. SELinux code is adjusted to all new names, types, and
signatures.

Note, given that bpf_prog_load (previously bpf_prog_alloc) hook can be
used by some LSMs to allocate extra security blob, but also by other
LSMs to reject BPF program loading, we need to make sure that
bpf_prog_free LSM hook is called after bpf_prog_load/bpf_prog_alloc one
*even* if the hook itself returned error. If we don't do that, we run
the risk of leaking memory. This seems to be possible today when
combining SELinux and BPF LSM, as one example, depending on their
relative ordering.

Also, for BPF LSM setup, add bpf_prog_load and bpf_prog_free to
sleepable LSM hooks list, as they are both executed in sleepable
context. Also drop bpf_prog_load hook from untrusted, as there is no
issue with refcount or anything else anymore, that originally forced us
to add it to untrusted list in c0c852dd1876 ("bpf: Do not mark certain LSM
hook arguments as trusted"). We now trigger this hook much later and it
should not be an issue anymore.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9fe88aef7deabbe87d3fc38c4aea3c69.paul@paul-moore.com/

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-10-andrii@kernel.org

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index d0eb20f90b26..cb2932fce448 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -2064,15 +2064,16 @@ static inline void securityfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
 union bpf_attr;
 struct bpf_map;
 struct bpf_prog;
-struct bpf_prog_aux;
+struct bpf_token;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
 extern int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size);
 extern int security_bpf_map(struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode);
 extern int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 extern int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map);
 extern void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map);
-extern int security_bpf_prog_alloc(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux);
-extern void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux);
+extern int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				  struct bpf_token *token);
+extern void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 #else
 static inline int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
 					     unsigned int size)
@@ -2098,12 +2099,13 @@ static inline int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map)
 static inline void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 { }
 
-static inline int security_bpf_prog_alloc(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
+static inline int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
+					 struct bpf_token *token)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
+static inline void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */