summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/locks.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJann Horn <jannh@google.com>2024-07-02 18:26:52 +0200
committerChristian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>2024-07-02 20:48:14 +0200
commit3cad1bc010416c6dd780643476bc59ed742436b9 (patch)
treedbf3cf60020c62045370a96a0ec4450cbe8265e2 /fs/locks.c
parent22a40d14b572deb80c0648557f4bd502d7e83826 (diff)
filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected
When fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with do_lock_file_wait(). However, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock while denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock. In theory (but AFAIK not in practice), posix_lock_file() could also fail to remove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range in the middle). After the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in lock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used to read arbitrary kernel memory, but can't corrupt kernel memory. This only affects systems with SELinux / Smack / AppArmor / BPF-LSM in enforcing mode and only works from some security contexts. Fix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to reliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and files_struct and is also used by filp_flush(). Fixes: c293621bbf67 ("[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling") Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=2563 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240702-fs-lock-recover-2-v1-1-edd456f63789@google.com Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/locks.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/locks.c9
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 90c8746874de..c360d1992d21 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2448,8 +2448,9 @@ int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock);
/*
- * Attempt to detect a close/fcntl race and recover by releasing the
- * lock that was just acquired. There is no need to do that when we're
+ * Detect close/fcntl races and recover by zapping all POSIX locks
+ * associated with this file and our files_struct, just like on
+ * filp_flush(). There is no need to do that when we're
* unlocking though, or for OFD locks.
*/
if (!error && file_lock->c.flc_type != F_UNLCK &&
@@ -2464,9 +2465,7 @@ int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
f = files_lookup_fd_locked(files, fd);
spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
if (f != filp) {
- file_lock->c.flc_type = F_UNLCK;
- error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(error);
+ locks_remove_posix(filp, files);
error = -EBADF;
}
}