afs: Don't truncate iter during data fetch

Don't truncate the iterator to correspond to the actual data size when
fetching the data from the server - rather, pass the length we want to read
to rxrpc.

This will allow the clear-after-read code in future to simply clear the
remaining iterator capacity rather than having to reinitialise the
iterator.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-By: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158861249201.340223.13035445866976590375.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/159465825061.1377938.14403904452300909320.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160588531418.3465195.10712005940763063144.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161118148567.1232039.13380313332292947956.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161161044610.2537118.17908520793806837792.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161340407907.1303470.6501394859511712746.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161539551721.286939.14655713136572200716.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v4
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161653807790.2770958.14034599989374173734.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v5
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161789090823.6155.15673999934535049102.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v6

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index 8be709cb8542..0ec38b758f29 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ void afs_make_call(struct afs_addr_cursor *ac, struct afs_call *call, gfp_t gfp)
 	struct rxrpc_call *rxcall;
 	struct msghdr msg;
 	struct kvec iov[1];
+	size_t len;
 	s64 tx_total_len;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -466,9 +467,10 @@ error_do_abort:
 		rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(call->net->socket, rxcall,
 					RX_USER_ABORT, ret, "KSD");
 	} else {
+		len = 0;
 		iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, READ, NULL, 0, 0);
 		rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(call->net->socket, rxcall,
-				       &msg.msg_iter, false,
+				       &msg.msg_iter, &len, false,
 				       &call->abort_code, &call->service_id);
 		ac->abort_code = call->abort_code;
 		ac->responded = true;
@@ -504,6 +506,7 @@ error_kill_call:
 static void afs_deliver_to_call(struct afs_call *call)
 {
 	enum afs_call_state state;
+	size_t len;
 	u32 abort_code, remote_abort = 0;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -516,10 +519,11 @@ static void afs_deliver_to_call(struct afs_call *call)
 	       state == AFS_CALL_SV_AWAIT_ACK
 	       ) {
 		if (state == AFS_CALL_SV_AWAIT_ACK) {
+			len = 0;
 			iov_iter_kvec(&call->def_iter, READ, NULL, 0, 0);
 			ret = rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(call->net->socket,
 						     call->rxcall, &call->def_iter,
-						     false, &remote_abort,
+						     &len, false, &remote_abort,
 						     &call->service_id);
 			trace_afs_receive_data(call, &call->def_iter, false, ret);
 
@@ -929,10 +933,11 @@ int afs_extract_data(struct afs_call *call, bool want_more)
 	u32 remote_abort = 0;
 	int ret;
 
-	_enter("{%s,%zu},%d", call->type->name, iov_iter_count(iter), want_more);
+	_enter("{%s,%zu,%zu},%d",
+	       call->type->name, call->iov_len, iov_iter_count(iter), want_more);
 
 	ret = rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(net->socket, call->rxcall, iter,
-				     want_more, &remote_abort,
+				     &call->iov_len, want_more, &remote_abort,
 				     &call->service_id);
 	if (ret == 0 || ret == -EAGAIN)
 		return ret;