diff options
| author | Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> | 2017-04-28 12:41:02 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> | 2017-05-04 13:44:23 -0700 |
| commit | 3d05f3aed5d721c2c77d20288c29ab26c6193ed5 (patch) | |
| tree | 9659622f82930732daa486273ff60cdaa6ca748f /drivers/md | |
| parent | 4ac4d584886a4f47f8ff3bca0f32ff9a2987d3e5 (diff) | |
md/raid5: make use of spin_lock_irq over local_irq_disable + spin_lock
On mainline, there is no functional difference, just less code, and
symmetric lock/unlock paths.
On PREEMPT_RT builds, this fixes the following warning, seen by
Alexander GQ Gerasiov, due to the sleeping nature of spinlocks.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:993
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 58, name: kworker/u12:1
CPU: 5 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/u12:1 Tainted: G W 4.9.20-rt16-stand6-686 #1
Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5027R-WRF/X9SRW-F, BIOS 3.2a 10/28/2015
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0)
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x47/0x68
? migrate_enable+0x4a/0xf0
___might_sleep+0x101/0x180
rt_spin_lock+0x17/0x40
add_stripe_bio+0x4e3/0x6c0 [raid456]
? preempt_count_add+0x42/0xb0
raid5_make_request+0x737/0xdd0 [raid456]
Reported-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@redlab-i.ru>
Tested-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@redlab-i.ru>
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/md')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/md/raid5.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index 2e38cfac5b1d..3809a2192132 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -103,8 +103,7 @@ static inline void unlock_device_hash_lock(struct r5conf *conf, int hash) static inline void lock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(struct r5conf *conf) { int i; - local_irq_disable(); - spin_lock(conf->hash_locks); + spin_lock_irq(conf->hash_locks); for (i = 1; i < NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS; i++) spin_lock_nest_lock(conf->hash_locks + i, conf->hash_locks); spin_lock(&conf->device_lock); @@ -114,9 +113,9 @@ static inline void unlock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(struct r5conf *conf) { int i; spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock); - for (i = NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS; i; i--) - spin_unlock(conf->hash_locks + i - 1); - local_irq_enable(); + for (i = NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS - 1; i; i--) + spin_unlock(conf->hash_locks + i); + spin_unlock_irq(conf->hash_locks); } /* Find first data disk in a raid6 stripe */ @@ -714,12 +713,11 @@ static bool is_full_stripe_write(struct stripe_head *sh) static void lock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2) { - local_irq_disable(); if (sh1 > sh2) { - spin_lock(&sh2->stripe_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&sh2->stripe_lock); spin_lock_nested(&sh1->stripe_lock, 1); } else { - spin_lock(&sh1->stripe_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&sh1->stripe_lock); spin_lock_nested(&sh2->stripe_lock, 1); } } @@ -727,8 +725,7 @@ static void lock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2) static void unlock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2) { spin_unlock(&sh1->stripe_lock); - spin_unlock(&sh2->stripe_lock); - local_irq_enable(); + spin_unlock_irq(&sh2->stripe_lock); } /* Only freshly new full stripe normal write stripe can be added to a batch list */ |