summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlfred Piccioni <alpic@google.com>2023-12-19 10:09:09 +0100
committerPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>2023-12-24 15:48:03 -0500
commitf1bb47a31dff6d4b34fb14e99850860ee74bb003 (patch)
tree8e7e4d5a92b7a523022307678492e29085866f08 /arch/arm
parentea67677dbb0d30b993b15790d6cee24c900dd597 (diff)
lsm: new security_file_ioctl_compat() hook
Some ioctl commands do not require ioctl permission, but are routed to other permissions such as FILE_GETATTR or FILE_SETATTR. This routing is done by comparing the ioctl cmd to a set of 64-bit flags (FS_IOC_*). However, if a 32-bit process is running on a 64-bit kernel, it emits 32-bit flags (FS_IOC32_*) for certain ioctl operations. These flags are being checked erroneously, which leads to these ioctl operations being routed to the ioctl permission, rather than the correct file permissions. This was also noted in a RED-PEN finding from a while back - "/* RED-PEN how should LSM module know it's handling 32bit? */". This patch introduces a new hook, security_file_ioctl_compat(), that is called from the compat ioctl syscall. All current LSMs have been changed to support this hook. Reviewing the three places where we are currently using security_file_ioctl(), it appears that only SELinux needs a dedicated compat change; TOMOYO and SMACK appear to be functional without any change. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0b24dcb7f2f7 ("Revert "selinux: simplify ioctl checking"") Signed-off-by: Alfred Piccioni <alpic@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> [PM: subject tweak, line length fixes, and alignment corrections] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions