diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-10-02 16:42:28 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-10-02 16:42:28 -0700 |
| commit | 7ec462100ef9142344ddbf86f2c3008b97acddbe (patch) | |
| tree | 13336f4eb789467c9811987e964e4aaf5be0b4c8 /Documentation | |
| parent | f23aa4c0761a70bfd046dd5755281667f0769a94 (diff) | |
| parent | 5f60d5f6bbc12e782fac78110b0ee62698f3b576 (diff) | |
Merge tag 'pull-work.unaligned' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
Pull generic unaligned.h cleanups from Al Viro:
"Get rid of architecture-specific <asm/unaligned.h> includes, replacing
them with a single generic <linux/unaligned.h> header file.
It's the second largest (after asm/io.h) class of asm/* includes, and
all but two architectures actually end up using exact same file.
Massage the remaining two (arc and parisc) to do the same and just
move the thing to from asm-generic/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h"
[ This is one of those things that we're better off doing outside the
merge window, and would only cause extra conflict noise if it was in
linux-next for the next release due to all the trivial #include line
updates. Rip off the band-aid. - Linus ]
* tag 'pull-work.unaligned' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h
arc: get rid of private asm/unaligned.h
parisc: get rid of private asm/unaligned.h
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/arch/arm/mem_alignment.rst | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst | 2 |
3 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm/mem_alignment.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm/mem_alignment.rst index aa22893b62bc..64bd77959300 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm/mem_alignment.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm/mem_alignment.rst @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ones. Of course this is a bad idea to rely on the alignment trap to perform unaligned memory access in general. If those access are predictable, you -are better to use the macros provided by include/asm/unaligned.h. The +are better to use the macros provided by include/linux/unaligned.h. The alignment trap can fixup misaligned access for the exception cases, but at a high performance cost. It better be rare. diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst b/Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst index 1ee82419d8aa..5ceeb80eb539 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Avoiding unaligned accesses =========================== The easiest way to avoid unaligned access is to use the get_unaligned() and -put_unaligned() macros provided by the <asm/unaligned.h> header file. +put_unaligned() macros provided by the <linux/unaligned.h> header file. Going back to an earlier example of code that potentially causes unaligned access:: diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst index 29c33e7e0855..fbe0989a8ce5 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ field2会导致非对齐访问，这并不是不合理的。你会期望field2 避免非对齐访问 ============== -避免非对齐访问的最简单方法是使用<asm/unaligned.h>头文件提供的get_unaligned()和 +避免非对齐访问的最简单方法是使用<linux/unaligned.h>头文件提供的get_unaligned()和 put_unaligned()宏。 回到前面的一个可能导致非对齐访问的代码例子:: |