summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-06-07gpio: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macrosJeff Johnson
On x86, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpio/gpio-mc33880.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.o Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro, including the one missing in gpio-pl061.c, which is not built for x86. Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606-md-drivers-gpio-v1-1-cb42d240ca5c@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
2023-05-23gpio: Switch i2c drivers back to use .probe()Uwe Kleine-König
After commit b8a1a4cd5a98 ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new() call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then 03c835f498b5 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from struct i2c_driver. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
2022-10-17drivers/gpio: use simple i2c probeStephen Kitt
All these drivers have an i2c probe function which doesn't use the "struct i2c_device_id *id" parameter, so they can trivially be converted to the "probe_new" style of probe with a single argument. This is part of an ongoing transition to single-argument i2c probe functions. Old-style probe functions involve a call to i2c_match_id: in drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c, /* * When there are no more users of probe(), * rename probe_new to probe. */ if (driver->probe_new) status = driver->probe_new(client); else if (driver->probe) status = driver->probe(client, i2c_match_id(driver->id_table, client)); else status = -EINVAL; Drivers which don't need the second parameter can be declared using probe_new instead, avoiding the call to i2c_match_id. Drivers which do can still be converted to probe_new-style, calling i2c_match_id themselves (as is done currently for of_match_id). This change was done using the following Coccinelle script, and fixed up for whitespace changes: @ rule1 @ identifier fn; identifier client, id; @@ - static int fn(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) + static int fn(struct i2c_client *client) { ...when != id } @ rule2 depends on rule1 @ identifier rule1.fn; identifier driver; @@ struct i2c_driver driver = { - .probe + .probe_new = ( fn | - &fn + fn ) , }; Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
2021-12-22gpio: Remove unused local OF node pointersAndy Shevchenko
After the commit 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") the OF node local pointers become unused. Remove them for good and make compiler happy about. Fixes: 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> [Bart: removed unrelated change in gpio-brcmstb] Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2021-12-17gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the driversAndy Shevchenko
GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual drivers. Remove these assignment all at once. For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation. While at it, remove duplicate parent device assignment where it is the case. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-By: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2019-02-09gpio: Add a Gateworks PLD GPIO driverLinus Walleij
This adds a driver for Gateworks PLD GPIO, that exist in two instances on the Gateworks Cambria GW2358-4 router platform at least. Cc: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org> Cc: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>