selftests/bpf: Support checks against a regular expression

Add support for __regex and __regex_unpriv macros to check the test
execution output against a regular expression. This is similar to __msg
and __msg_unpriv, however those expect do substring matching.

Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240617141458.471620-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com

1 files changed, 88 insertions, 27 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index 524c38e9cde4..f14e10b0de96 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
+#include <regex.h>
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
 
@@ -17,9 +18,11 @@
 #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE "comment:test_expect_failure"
 #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS "comment:test_expect_success"
 #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX "comment:test_expect_msg="
+#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX "comment:test_expect_regex="
 #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_failure_unpriv"
 #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_success_unpriv"
 #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_msg_unpriv="
+#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_regex_unpriv="
 #define TEST_TAG_LOG_LEVEL_PFX "comment:test_log_level="
 #define TEST_TAG_PROG_FLAGS_PFX "comment:test_prog_flags="
 #define TEST_TAG_DESCRIPTION_PFX "comment:test_description="
@@ -46,10 +49,16 @@ enum mode {
 	UNPRIV = 2
 };
 
+struct expect_msg {
+	const char *substr; /* substring match */
+	const char *regex_str; /* regex-based match */
+	regex_t regex;
+};
+
 struct test_subspec {
 	char *name;
 	bool expect_failure;
-	const char **expect_msgs;
+	struct expect_msg *expect_msgs;
 	size_t expect_msg_cnt;
 	int retval;
 	bool execute;
@@ -89,6 +98,16 @@ void test_loader_fini(struct test_loader *tester)
 
 static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec)
 {
+	int i;
+
+	/* Deallocate expect_msgs arrays. */
+	for (i = 0; i < spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt; i++)
+		if (spec->priv.expect_msgs[i].regex_str)
+			regfree(&spec->priv.expect_msgs[i].regex);
+	for (i = 0; i < spec->unpriv.expect_msg_cnt; i++)
+		if (spec->unpriv.expect_msgs[i].regex_str)
+			regfree(&spec->unpriv.expect_msgs[i].regex);
+
 	free(spec->priv.name);
 	free(spec->unpriv.name);
 	free(spec->priv.expect_msgs);
@@ -100,18 +119,38 @@ static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec)
 	spec->unpriv.expect_msgs = NULL;
 }
 
-static int push_msg(const char *msg, struct test_subspec *subspec)
+static int push_msg(const char *substr, const char *regex_str, struct test_subspec *subspec)
 {
 	void *tmp;
+	int regcomp_res;
+	char error_msg[100];
+	struct expect_msg *msg;
 
-	tmp = realloc(subspec->expect_msgs, (1 + subspec->expect_msg_cnt) * sizeof(void *));
+	tmp = realloc(subspec->expect_msgs,
+		      (1 + subspec->expect_msg_cnt) * sizeof(struct expect_msg));
 	if (!tmp) {
 		ASSERT_FAIL("failed to realloc memory for messages\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	subspec->expect_msgs = tmp;
-	subspec->expect_msgs[subspec->expect_msg_cnt++] = msg;
+	msg = &subspec->expect_msgs[subspec->expect_msg_cnt];
+
+	if (substr) {
+		msg->substr = substr;
+		msg->regex_str = NULL;
+	} else {
+		msg->regex_str = regex_str;
+		msg->substr = NULL;
+		regcomp_res = regcomp(&msg->regex, regex_str, REG_EXTENDED|REG_NEWLINE);
+		if (regcomp_res != 0) {
+			regerror(regcomp_res, &msg->regex, error_msg, sizeof(error_msg));
+			PRINT_FAIL("Regexp compilation error in '%s': '%s'\n",
+				   regex_str, error_msg);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
 
+	subspec->expect_msg_cnt += 1;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -233,13 +272,25 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
 			spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
 		} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX)) {
 			msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX) - 1;
-			err = push_msg(msg, &spec->priv);
+			err = push_msg(msg, NULL, &spec->priv);
 			if (err)
 				goto cleanup;
 			spec->mode_mask |= PRIV;
 		} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV)) {
 			msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV) - 1;
-			err = push_msg(msg, &spec->unpriv);
+			err = push_msg(msg, NULL, &spec->unpriv);
+			if (err)
+				goto cleanup;
+			spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
+		} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX)) {
+			msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX) - 1;
+			err = push_msg(NULL, msg, &spec->priv);
+			if (err)
+				goto cleanup;
+			spec->mode_mask |= PRIV;
+		} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX_UNPRIV)) {
+			msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX_UNPRIV) - 1;
+			err = push_msg(NULL, msg, &spec->unpriv);
 			if (err)
 				goto cleanup;
 			spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
@@ -337,16 +388,13 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
 		}
 
 		if (!spec->unpriv.expect_msgs) {
-			size_t sz = spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt * sizeof(void *);
+			for (i = 0; i < spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt; i++) {
+				struct expect_msg *msg = &spec->priv.expect_msgs[i];
 
-			spec->unpriv.expect_msgs = malloc(sz);
-			if (!spec->unpriv.expect_msgs) {
-				PRINT_FAIL("failed to allocate memory for unpriv.expect_msgs\n");
-				err = -ENOMEM;
-				goto cleanup;
+				err = push_msg(msg->substr, msg->regex_str, &spec->unpriv);
+				if (err)
+					goto cleanup;
 			}
-			memcpy(spec->unpriv.expect_msgs, spec->priv.expect_msgs, sz);
-			spec->unpriv.expect_msg_cnt = spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -402,27 +450,40 @@ static void validate_case(struct test_loader *tester,
 			  struct bpf_program *prog,
 			  int load_err)
 {
-	int i, j;
+	int i, j, err;
+	char *match;
+	regmatch_t reg_match[1];
 
 	for (i = 0; i < subspec->expect_msg_cnt; i++) {
-		char *match;
-		const char *expect_msg;
-
-		expect_msg = subspec->expect_msgs[i];
+		struct expect_msg *msg = &subspec->expect_msgs[i];
+
+		if (msg->substr) {
+			match = strstr(tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, msg->substr);
+			if (match)
+				tester->next_match_pos = match - tester->log_buf + strlen(msg->substr);
+		} else {
+			err = regexec(&msg->regex,
+				      tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, 1, reg_match, 0);
+			if (err == 0) {
+				match = tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos + reg_match[0].rm_so;
+				tester->next_match_pos += reg_match[0].rm_eo;
+			} else {
+				match = NULL;
+			}
+		}
 
-		match = strstr(tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, expect_msg);
 		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(match, "expect_msg")) {
-			/* if we are in verbose mode, we've already emitted log */
 			if (env.verbosity == VERBOSE_NONE)
 				emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, true /*force*/);
-			for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
-				fprintf(stderr,
-					"MATCHED  MSG: '%s'\n", subspec->expect_msgs[j]);
-			fprintf(stderr, "EXPECTED MSG: '%s'\n", expect_msg);
+			for (j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
+				msg = &subspec->expect_msgs[j];
+				fprintf(stderr, "%s %s: '%s'\n",
+					j < i ? "MATCHED " : "EXPECTED",
+					msg->substr ? "SUBSTR" : " REGEX",
+					msg->substr ?: msg->regex_str);
+			}
 			return;
 		}
-
-		tester->next_match_pos = match - tester->log_buf + strlen(expect_msg);
 	}
 }