diff options
| author | Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> | 2023-07-13 02:56:40 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-07-13 16:24:29 -0700 |
| commit | d2284d68259c8816fc0dbcb89a0e56849e1f24c2 (patch) | |
| tree | af13e7c0898f58799fd3f393a571798ee6088dc2 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c | |
| parent | 7ce4dc3e4a9d954c8a1fb483c7a527e9b060b860 (diff) | |
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for nested_trust
Add selftests for nested_strust to check whehter PTR_UNTRUSTED is cleared
as expected, the result as follows:
#141/1 nested_trust/test_read_cpumask:OK
#141/2 nested_trust/test_skb_field:OK <<<<
#141/3 nested_trust/test_invalid_nested_user_cpus:OK
#141/4 nested_trust/test_invalid_nested_offset:OK
#141/5 nested_trust/test_invalid_skb_field:OK <<<<
#141 nested_trust:OK
The #141/2 and #141/5 are newly added.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713025642.27477-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c index 0d1aa6bbace4..ea39497f11ed 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/nested_trust_failure.c @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE); + __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); + __type(key, int); + __type(value, u64); +} sk_storage_map SEC(".maps"); + /* Prototype for all of the program trace events below: * * TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, @@ -31,3 +38,12 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_invalid_nested_offset, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla bpf_cpumask_first_zero(&task->cpus_mask); return 0; } + +/* Although R2 is of type sk_buff but sock_common is expected, we will hit untrusted ptr first. */ +SEC("tp_btf/tcp_probe") +__failure __msg("R2 type=untrusted_ptr_ expected=ptr_, trusted_ptr_, rcu_ptr_") +int BPF_PROG(test_invalid_skb_field, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + bpf_sk_storage_get(&sk_storage_map, skb->next, 0, 0); + return 0; +} |