diff options
| author | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2020-10-16 09:02:26 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2020-10-17 15:05:30 -0600 |
| commit | 91989c707884ecc7cd537281ab1a4b8fb7219da3 (patch) | |
| tree | 6233f38efc87d14b003fa217460378a4338b5a28 /security/yama | |
| parent | 3c532798ec96b6c2d77706f04ed1d8b566a805df (diff) | |
task_work: cleanup notification modes
A previous commit changed the notification mode from true/false to an
int, allowing notify-no, notify-yes, or signal-notify. This was
backwards compatible in the sense that any existing true/false user
would translate to either 0 (on notification sent) or 1, the latter
which mapped to TWA_RESUME. TWA_SIGNAL was assigned a value of 2.
Clean this up properly, and define a proper enum for the notification
mode. Now we have:
- TWA_NONE. This is 0, same as before the original change, meaning no
notification requested.
- TWA_RESUME. This is 1, same as before the original change, meaning
that we use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.
- TWA_SIGNAL. This uses TIF_SIGPENDING/JOBCTL_TASK_WORK for the
notification.
Clean up all the callers, switching their 0/1/false/true to using the
appropriate TWA_* mode for notifications.
Fixes: e91b48162332 ("task_work: teach task_work_add() to do signal_wake_up()")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/yama')
| -rw-r--r-- | security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c index 536c99646f6a..06e226166aab 100644 --- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c +++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void report_access(const char *access, struct task_struct *target, info->access = access; info->target = target; info->agent = agent; - if (task_work_add(current, &info->work, true) == 0) + if (task_work_add(current, &info->work, TWA_RESUME) == 0) return; /* success */ WARN(1, "report_access called from exiting task"); |