diff options
author | Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> | 2023-09-29 20:32:40 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-10-18 14:34:13 -0700 |
commit | 3022fd7af9604d44ec43da8a4398872989599b18 (patch) | |
tree | 8ab0858bdd7ffc7b3a91479c28d2c4a1986df7c2 /samples/bpf | |
parent | 054a9f7ccd0a60607fb9bbe1e06ca671494971bf (diff) |
shmem: _add_to_page_cache() before shmem_inode_acct_blocks()
There has been a recurring problem, that when a tmpfs volume is being
filled by racing threads, some fail with ENOSPC (or consequent SIGBUS or
EFAULT) even though all allocations were within the permitted size.
This was a problem since early days, but magnified and complicated by the
addition of huge pages. We have often worked around it by adding some
slop to the tmpfs size, but it's hard to say how much is needed, and some
users prefer not to do that e.g. keeping sparse files in a tightly
tailored tmpfs helps to prevent accidental writing to holes.
This comes from the allocation sequence:
1. check page cache for existing folio
2. check and reserve from vm_enough_memory
3. check and account from size of tmpfs
4. if huge, check page cache for overlapping folio
5. allocate physical folio, huge or small
6. check and charge from mem cgroup limit
7. add to page cache (but maybe another folio already got in).
Concurrent tasks allocating at the same position could deplete the size
allowance and fail. Doing vm_enough_memory and size checks before the
folio allocation was intentional (to limit the load on the page allocator
from this source) and still has some virtue; but memory cgroup never did
that, so I think it's better reordered to favour predictable behaviour.
1. check page cache for existing folio
2. if huge, check page cache for overlapping folio
3. allocate physical folio, huge or small
4. check and charge from mem cgroup limit
5. add to page cache (but maybe another folio already got in)
6. check and reserve from vm_enough_memory
7. check and account from size of tmpfs.
The folio lock held from allocation onwards ensures that the !uptodate
folio cannot be used by others, and can safely be deleted from the cache
if checks 6 or 7 subsequently fail (and those waiting on folio lock
already check that the folio was not truncated once they get the lock);
and the early addition to page cache ensures that racers find it before
they try to duplicate the accounting.
Seize the opportunity to tidy up shmem_get_folio_gfp()'s ENOSPC retrying,
which can be combined inside the new shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(): doing 2
splits twice (once huge, once nonhuge) is not exactly equivalent to trying
5 splits (and giving up early on huge), but let's keep it simple unless
more complication proves necessary.
Userfaultfd is a foreign country: they do things differently there, and
for good reason - to avoid mmap_lock deadlock. Leave ordering in
shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() untouched for now, but I would rather like to
mesh it better with shmem_get_folio_gfp() in the future.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/22ddd06-d919-33b-1219-56335c1bf28e@google.com
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples/bpf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions