diff options
author | Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> | 2020-03-21 18:22:41 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-03-21 18:56:06 -0700 |
commit | 763802b53a427ed3cbd419dbba255c414fdd9e7c (patch) | |
tree | b6dc4f611e81120ace08263b06a014bda53f0f53 /mm | |
parent | 0715e6c516f106ed553828a671d30ad9a3431536 (diff) |
x86/mm: split vmalloc_sync_all()
Commit 3f8fd02b1bf1 ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in
__purge_vmap_area_lazy()") introduced a call to vmalloc_sync_all() in
the vunmap() code-path. While this change was necessary to maintain
correctness on x86-32-pae kernels, it also adds additional cycles for
architectures that don't need it.
Specifically on x86-64 with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y some people reported
severe performance regressions in micro-benchmarks because it now also
calls the x86-64 implementation of vmalloc_sync_all() on vunmap(). But
the vmalloc_sync_all() implementation on x86-64 is only needed for newly
created mappings.
To avoid the unnecessary work on x86-64 and to gain the performance
back, split up vmalloc_sync_all() into two functions:
* vmalloc_sync_mappings(), and
* vmalloc_sync_unmappings()
Most call-sites to vmalloc_sync_all() only care about new mappings being
synchronized. The only exception is the new call-site added in the
above mentioned commit.
Shile Zhang directed us to a report of an 80% regression in reaim
throughput.
Fixes: 3f8fd02b1bf1 ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in __purge_vmap_area_lazy()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [GHES]
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191009124418.8286-1-joro@8bytes.org
Link: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org/thread/4D3JPPHBNOSPFK2KEPC6KGKS6J25AIDB/
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191113095530.228959-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/nommu.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmalloc.c | 11 |
2 files changed, 14 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c index bd2b4e5ef144..318df4e236c9 100644 --- a/mm/nommu.c +++ b/mm/nommu.c @@ -370,10 +370,14 @@ void vm_unmap_aliases(void) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_unmap_aliases); /* - * Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_all() if the architecture chose not to - * have one. + * Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_[un]mapping() if the architecture + * chose not to have one. */ -void __weak vmalloc_sync_all(void) +void __weak vmalloc_sync_mappings(void) +{ +} + +void __weak vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void) { } diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 1f46c3b86f9f..6b8eeb0ecee5 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) * First make sure the mappings are removed from all page-tables * before they are freed. */ - vmalloc_sync_all(); + vmalloc_sync_unmappings(); /* * TODO: to calculate a flush range without looping. @@ -3128,16 +3128,19 @@ int remap_vmalloc_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *addr, EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_vmalloc_range); /* - * Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_all() if the architecture chose not to - * have one. + * Implement stubs for vmalloc_sync_[un]mappings () if the architecture chose + * not to have one. * * The purpose of this function is to make sure the vmalloc area * mappings are identical in all page-tables in the system. */ -void __weak vmalloc_sync_all(void) +void __weak vmalloc_sync_mappings(void) { } +void __weak vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void) +{ +} static int f(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, void *data) { |