diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-08-26 09:02:18 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-08-26 09:02:18 -0700 |
commit | 0adb8f3d312966bd3e712248b48098ce086d03bd (patch) | |
tree | 948eed0b139176ca4c79cefe51d38e8adc09723e /kernel | |
parent | 53ede64de3da17f76628b493f5e19a01804939d3 (diff) | |
parent | 2fe59f507a65dbd734b990a11ebc7488f6f87a24 (diff) |
Merge branch 'timers-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull timer fix from Ingo Molnar:
"Fix a timer granularity handling race+bug, which would manifest itself
by spuriously increasing timeouts of some timers (from 1 jiffy to ~500
jiffies in the worst case measured) in certain nohz states"
* 'timers-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
timers: Fix excessive granularity of new timers after a nohz idle
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timer.c | 50 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c index 8f5d1bf18854..f2674a056c26 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timer.c +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ struct timer_base { bool migration_enabled; bool nohz_active; bool is_idle; + bool must_forward_clk; DECLARE_BITMAP(pending_map, WHEEL_SIZE); struct hlist_head vectors[WHEEL_SIZE]; } ____cacheline_aligned; @@ -856,13 +857,19 @@ get_target_base(struct timer_base *base, unsigned tflags) static inline void forward_timer_base(struct timer_base *base) { - unsigned long jnow = READ_ONCE(jiffies); + unsigned long jnow; /* - * We only forward the base when it's idle and we have a delta between - * base clock and jiffies. + * We only forward the base when we are idle or have just come out of + * idle (must_forward_clk logic), and have a delta between base clock + * and jiffies. In the common case, run_timers will take care of it. */ - if (!base->is_idle || (long) (jnow - base->clk) < 2) + if (likely(!base->must_forward_clk)) + return; + + jnow = READ_ONCE(jiffies); + base->must_forward_clk = base->is_idle; + if ((long)(jnow - base->clk) < 2) return; /* @@ -938,6 +945,11 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, bool pending_only) * same array bucket then just return: */ if (timer_pending(timer)) { + /* + * The downside of this optimization is that it can result in + * larger granularity than you would get from adding a new + * timer with this expiry. + */ if (timer->expires == expires) return 1; @@ -948,6 +960,7 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, bool pending_only) * dequeue/enqueue dance. */ base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags); + forward_timer_base(base); clk = base->clk; idx = calc_wheel_index(expires, clk); @@ -964,6 +977,7 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, bool pending_only) } } else { base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags); + forward_timer_base(base); } ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, false); @@ -991,12 +1005,10 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires, bool pending_only) raw_spin_lock(&base->lock); WRITE_ONCE(timer->flags, (timer->flags & ~TIMER_BASEMASK) | base->cpu); + forward_timer_base(base); } } - /* Try to forward a stale timer base clock */ - forward_timer_base(base); - timer->expires = expires; /* * If 'idx' was calculated above and the base time did not advance @@ -1112,6 +1124,7 @@ void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *timer, int cpu) WRITE_ONCE(timer->flags, (timer->flags & ~TIMER_BASEMASK) | cpu); } + forward_timer_base(base); debug_activate(timer, timer->expires); internal_add_timer(base, timer); @@ -1497,10 +1510,16 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem) if (!is_max_delta) expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC; /* - * If we expect to sleep more than a tick, mark the base idle: + * If we expect to sleep more than a tick, mark the base idle. + * Also the tick is stopped so any added timer must forward + * the base clk itself to keep granularity small. This idle + * logic is only maintained for the BASE_STD base, deferrable + * timers may still see large granularity skew (by design). */ - if ((expires - basem) > TICK_NSEC) + if ((expires - basem) > TICK_NSEC) { + base->must_forward_clk = true; base->is_idle = true; + } } raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock); @@ -1611,6 +1630,19 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h) { struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]); + /* + * must_forward_clk must be cleared before running timers so that any + * timer functions that call mod_timer will not try to forward the + * base. idle trcking / clock forwarding logic is only used with + * BASE_STD timers. + * + * The deferrable base does not do idle tracking at all, so we do + * not forward it. This can result in very large variations in + * granularity for deferrable timers, but they can be deferred for + * long periods due to idle. + */ + base->must_forward_clk = false; + __run_timers(base); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) && base->nohz_active) __run_timers(this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_DEF])); |