diff options
| author | Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> | 2019-10-21 15:44:12 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2019-10-23 14:48:24 +0200 |
| commit | 7f2cbcbcafbca5360efbd175b3320852b8f7c637 (patch) | |
| tree | 1bb662f4081e1e3c1e9352ca22f0394c288f11a1 /kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | |
| parent | 086ee46b08634a999bcd1707eabe3b0dc1806674 (diff) | |
posix-cpu-timers: Fix two trivial comments
Recent changes modified the function arguments of
thread_group_sample_cputime() and task_cputimers_expired(), but forgot to
update the comments. Fix it up.
[ tglx: Changed the argument name of task_cputimers_expired() as the pointer
points to an array of samples. ]
Fixes: b7be4ef1365d ("posix-cpu-timers: Switch thread group sampling to array")
Fixes: 001f7971433a ("posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry checks array based")
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1571643852-21848-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c index 92a431981b1c..42d512fcfda2 100644 --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void update_gt_cputime(struct task_cputime_atomic *cputime_atomic, /** * thread_group_sample_cputime - Sample cputime for a given task * @tsk: Task for which cputime needs to be started - * @iimes: Storage for time samples + * @samples: Storage for time samples * * Called from sys_getitimer() to calculate the expiry time of an active * timer. That means group cputime accounting is already active. Called @@ -1038,12 +1038,12 @@ unlock: * member of @pct->bases[CLK].nextevt. False otherwise */ static inline bool -task_cputimers_expired(const u64 *sample, struct posix_cputimers *pct) +task_cputimers_expired(const u64 *samples, struct posix_cputimers *pct) { int i; for (i = 0; i < CPUCLOCK_MAX; i++) { - if (sample[i] >= pct->bases[i].nextevt) + if (samples[i] >= pct->bases[i].nextevt) return true; } return false; |