diff options
author | Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> | 2024-04-15 11:21:13 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-04-16 13:59:45 +0200 |
commit | fe90f3967bdb3e13f133e5f44025e15f943a99c5 (patch) | |
tree | d27ac4b6dc9788dc8e7113e9deaafb228ccff862 /kernel/sched | |
parent | 0bbac3facb5d6cc0171c45c9873a2dc96bea9680 (diff) |
sched: Add missing memory barrier in switch_mm_cid
Many architectures' switch_mm() (e.g. arm64) do not have an smp_mb()
which the core scheduler code has depended upon since commit:
commit 223baf9d17f25 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
If switch_mm() doesn't call smp_mb(), sched_mm_cid_remote_clear() can
unset the actively used cid when it fails to observe active task after it
sets lazy_put.
There *is* a memory barrier between storing to rq->curr and _return to
userspace_ (as required by membarrier), but the rseq mm_cid has stricter
requirements: the barrier needs to be issued between store to rq->curr
and switch_mm_cid(), which happens earlier than:
- spin_unlock(),
- switch_to().
So it's fine when the architecture switch_mm() happens to have that
barrier already, but less so when the architecture only provides the
full barrier in switch_to() or spin_unlock().
It is a bug in the rseq switch_mm_cid() implementation. All architectures
that don't have memory barriers in switch_mm(), but rather have the full
barrier either in finish_lock_switch() or switch_to() have them too late
for the needs of switch_mm_cid().
Introduce a new smp_mb__after_switch_mm(), defined as smp_mb() in the
generic barrier.h header, and use it in switch_mm_cid() for scheduler
transitions where switch_mm() is expected to provide a memory barrier.
Architectures can override smp_mb__after_switch_mm() if their
switch_mm() implementation provides an implicit memory barrier.
Override it with a no-op on x86 which implicitly provide this memory
barrier by writing to CR3.
Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Reported-by: levi.yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> # for arm64
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> # for x86
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.4.x
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240415152114.59122-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/sched.h | 20 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index d2242679239e..ae50f212775e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ # include <asm/paravirt_api_clock.h> #endif +#include <asm/barrier.h> + #include "cpupri.h" #include "cpudeadline.h" @@ -3445,13 +3447,19 @@ static inline void switch_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, * between rq->curr store and load of {prev,next}->mm->pcpu_cid[cpu]. * Provide it here. */ - if (!prev->mm) // from kernel + if (!prev->mm) { // from kernel smp_mb(); - /* - * user -> user transition guarantees a memory barrier through - * switch_mm() when current->mm changes. If current->mm is - * unchanged, no barrier is needed. - */ + } else { // from user + /* + * user->user transition relies on an implicit + * memory barrier in switch_mm() when + * current->mm changes. If the architecture + * switch_mm() does not have an implicit memory + * barrier, it is emitted here. If current->mm + * is unchanged, no barrier is needed. + */ + smp_mb__after_switch_mm(); + } } if (prev->mm_cid_active) { mm_cid_snapshot_time(rq, prev->mm); |