diff options
author | Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> | 2023-09-22 16:05:35 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2023-09-24 12:08:29 +0200 |
commit | 2f8c62296b6f656bbfd17e9f1fadd7478003a9d9 (patch) | |
tree | 0e8239cc8dcdbaf23107992ab5a017e5f0f2af7e /kernel/sched/fair.c | |
parent | 30797bce8ef0c73f0c388148ffac92458533b10e (diff) |
sched/fair: Fix warning in bandwidth distribution
We've observed the following warning being hit in
distribute_cfs_runtime():
SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0)
We have the following race:
- CPU 0: running bandwidth distribution (distribute_cfs_runtime).
Inspects the local cfs_rq and makes its runtime_remaining positive.
However, we defer unthrottling the local cfs_rq until after
considering all remote cfs_rq's.
- CPU 1: starts running bandwidth distribution from the slack timer. When
it finds the cfs_rq for CPU 0 on the throttled list, it observers the
that the cfs_rq is throttled, yet is not on the CSD list, and has a
positive runtime_remaining, thus triggering the warning in
distribute_cfs_runtime.
To fix this, we can rework the local unthrottling logic to put the local
cfs_rq on a local list, so that any future bandwidth distributions will
realize that the cfs_rq is about to be unthrottled.
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922230535.296350-2-joshdon@google.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/fair.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 41c960eca792..2973173ad850 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5741,13 +5741,13 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) { - struct cfs_rq *local_unthrottle = NULL; int this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); u64 runtime, remaining = 1; bool throttled = false; - struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, *tmp; struct rq_flags rf; struct rq *rq; + LIST_HEAD(local_unthrottle); rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq, @@ -5782,11 +5782,17 @@ static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) /* we check whether we're throttled above */ if (cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0) { - if (cpu_of(rq) != this_cpu || - SCHED_WARN_ON(local_unthrottle)) + if (cpu_of(rq) != this_cpu) { unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(cfs_rq); - else - local_unthrottle = cfs_rq; + } else { + /* + * We currently only expect to be unthrottling + * a single cfs_rq locally. + */ + SCHED_WARN_ON(!list_empty(&local_unthrottle)); + list_add_tail(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list, + &local_unthrottle); + } } else { throttled = true; } @@ -5794,15 +5800,23 @@ static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) next: rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf); } - rcu_read_unlock(); - if (local_unthrottle) { - rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu); + list_for_each_entry_safe(cfs_rq, tmp, &local_unthrottle, + throttled_csd_list) { + struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq); + rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf); - if (cfs_rq_throttled(local_unthrottle)) - unthrottle_cfs_rq(local_unthrottle); + + list_del_init(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list); + + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) + unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); + rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf); } + SCHED_WARN_ON(!list_empty(&local_unthrottle)); + + rcu_read_unlock(); return throttled; } |