diff options
| author | Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> | 2023-07-25 13:39:12 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2023-08-01 13:45:08 +0200 |
| commit | 16e95a62eed18864aecac404f1e4eed764c363f2 (patch) | |
| tree | 70d77f724539bb5a1ca8163dacc97bd6713f1876 /drivers/thermal/intel | |
| parent | 5d0c230f1de8c7515b6567d9afba1f196fb4e2f4 (diff) | |
powercap: intel_rapl: Fix a sparse warning in TPMI interface
Depends on the interface used, the RAPL registers can be either MSR
indexes or memory mapped IO addresses. Current RAPL common code uses u64
to save both MSR and memory mapped IO registers. With this, when
handling register address with an __iomem annotation, it triggers a
sparse warning like below:
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected unsigned long long [usertype] *tpmi_rapl_regs @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: expected unsigned long long [usertype] *tpmi_rapl_regs
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *
Fix the problem by using a union to save the registers instead.
Suggested-by: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307031405.dy3druuy-lkp@intel.com/
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/thermal/intel')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_rapl.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_rapl.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_rapl.c index 013f1633f082..2f00fc3bf274 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_rapl.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_rapl.c @@ -57,10 +57,10 @@ static int rapl_mmio_cpu_down_prep(unsigned int cpu) static int rapl_mmio_read_raw(int cpu, struct reg_action *ra) { - if (!ra->reg) + if (!ra->reg.mmio) return -EINVAL; - ra->value = readq((void __iomem *)ra->reg); + ra->value = readq(ra->reg.mmio); ra->value &= ra->mask; return 0; } @@ -69,13 +69,13 @@ static int rapl_mmio_write_raw(int cpu, struct reg_action *ra) { u64 val; - if (!ra->reg) + if (!ra->reg.mmio) return -EINVAL; - val = readq((void __iomem *)ra->reg); + val = readq(ra->reg.mmio); val &= ~ra->mask; val |= ra->value; - writeq(val, (void __iomem *)ra->reg); + writeq(val, ra->reg.mmio); return 0; } @@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ int proc_thermal_rapl_add(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct proc_thermal_device *proc for (domain = RAPL_DOMAIN_PACKAGE; domain < RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX; domain++) { for (reg = RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_LIMIT; reg < RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_MAX; reg++) if (rapl_regs->regs[domain][reg]) - rapl_mmio_priv.regs[domain][reg] = - (u64)proc_priv->mmio_base + + rapl_mmio_priv.regs[domain][reg].mmio = + proc_priv->mmio_base + rapl_regs->regs[domain][reg]; rapl_mmio_priv.limits[domain] = rapl_regs->limits[domain]; } rapl_mmio_priv.type = RAPL_IF_MMIO; - rapl_mmio_priv.reg_unit = (u64)proc_priv->mmio_base + rapl_regs->reg_unit; + rapl_mmio_priv.reg_unit.mmio = proc_priv->mmio_base + rapl_regs->reg_unit; rapl_mmio_priv.read_raw = rapl_mmio_read_raw; rapl_mmio_priv.write_raw = rapl_mmio_write_raw; |