summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/s390/block
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>2019-12-19 09:43:50 +0100
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2019-12-20 11:52:01 -0700
commitdd4b3c83b9efac10d48a94c61372119fc555a077 (patch)
treee62489927db3e2f4cf5caa0d302e13e98d3dccfa /drivers/s390/block
parentb3c6a59975415bde29cfd76ff1ab008edbf614a9 (diff)
s390/dasd/cio: Interpret ccw_device_get_mdc return value correctly
The max data count (mdc) is an unsigned 16-bit integer value as per AR documentation and is received via ccw_device_get_mdc() for a specific path mask from the CIO layer. The function itself also always returns a positive mdc value or 0 in case mdc isn't supported or couldn't be determined. Though, the comment for this function describes a negative return value to indicate failures. As a result, the DASD device driver interprets the return value of ccw_device_get_mdc() incorrectly. The error case is essentially a dead code path. To fix this behaviour, check explicitly for a return value of 0 and change the comment for ccw_device_get_mdc() accordingly. This fix merely enables the error code path in the DASD functions get_fcx_max_data() and verify_fcx_max_data(). The actual functionality stays the same and is still correct. Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/s390/block')
-rw-r--r--drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c9
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
index c94184d080f8..f5622f4a2ecf 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
@@ -1128,7 +1128,8 @@ static u32 get_fcx_max_data(struct dasd_device *device)
{
struct dasd_eckd_private *private = device->private;
int fcx_in_css, fcx_in_gneq, fcx_in_features;
- int tpm, mdc;
+ unsigned int mdc;
+ int tpm;
if (dasd_nofcx)
return 0;
@@ -1142,7 +1143,7 @@ static u32 get_fcx_max_data(struct dasd_device *device)
return 0;
mdc = ccw_device_get_mdc(device->cdev, 0);
- if (mdc < 0) {
+ if (mdc == 0) {
dev_warn(&device->cdev->dev, "Detecting the maximum supported data size for zHPF requests failed\n");
return 0;
} else {
@@ -1153,12 +1154,12 @@ static u32 get_fcx_max_data(struct dasd_device *device)
static int verify_fcx_max_data(struct dasd_device *device, __u8 lpm)
{
struct dasd_eckd_private *private = device->private;
- int mdc;
+ unsigned int mdc;
u32 fcx_max_data;
if (private->fcx_max_data) {
mdc = ccw_device_get_mdc(device->cdev, lpm);
- if ((mdc < 0)) {
+ if (mdc == 0) {
dev_warn(&device->cdev->dev,
"Detecting the maximum data size for zHPF "
"requests failed (rc=%d) for a new path %x\n",