summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/char
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDuoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>2023-01-18 22:10:00 +0800
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2023-01-19 17:22:38 +0100
commit70fae37a09268455b8ab4f64647086b61da6f39c (patch)
tree12fcddc6a5e89c1c5f0e8fd8f2ed4ac4e6e1d36c /drivers/char
parentaf35dbad4a4af023536c17d9bc91a77171bc35df (diff)
Revert "char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol"
This reverts commit be826ada52f1fcabed5b5217c94609ebf5967211. The function monitor_card() is a timer handler that runs in an atomic context, but it calls usleep_range() that can sleep. As a result, the sleep-in-atomic-context bugs will happen. The process is shown below: (atomic context) monitor_card() set_protocol() usleep_range() //sleep The origin commit c1986ee9bea3 ("[PATCH] New Omnikey Cardman 4000 driver") works fine. Fixes: be826ada52f1 ("char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118141000.5580-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/char')
-rw-r--r--drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c b/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c
index adaec8fd4b16..e656f42a28ac 100644
--- a/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c
@@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ static int set_protocol(struct cm4000_dev *dev, struct ptsreq *ptsreq)
DEBUGP(5, dev, "NumRecBytes is valid\n");
break;
}
- usleep_range(10000, 11000);
+ /* can not sleep as this is in atomic context */
+ mdelay(10);
}
if (i == 100) {
DEBUGP(5, dev, "Timeout waiting for NumRecBytes getting "
@@ -549,7 +550,8 @@ static int set_protocol(struct cm4000_dev *dev, struct ptsreq *ptsreq)
}
break;
}
- usleep_range(10000, 11000);
+ /* can not sleep as this is in atomic context */
+ mdelay(10);
}
/* check whether it is a short PTS reply? */