summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRyan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>2023-07-24 09:25:16 +0100
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2023-08-18 10:12:42 -0700
commitf6dd4e223d8798319d0e2815a468b9fb0a276446 (patch)
tree76e85c505899778f822367f8e73d60f24875fe52 /README
parent58e2847ad2e6322a25dedf8b4549ff924baf8395 (diff)
selftests/mm: skip soft-dirty tests on arm64
arm64 does not support the soft-dirty PTE bit. However, the `soft-dirty` test suite is currently run unconditionally and therefore generates spurious test failures on arm64. There are also some tests in `madv_populate` which assume it is supported. For `soft-dirty` lets disable the whole suite for arm64; it is no longer built and run_vmtests.sh will skip it if its not present. For `madv_populate`, we need a runtime mechanism so that the remaining tests continue to be run. Unfortunately, the only way to determine if the soft-dirty dirty bit is supported is to write to a page, then see if the bit is set in /proc/self/pagemap. But the tests that we want to conditionally execute are testing precicesly this. So if we introduced this feature check, we could accedentally turn a real failure (on a system that claims to support soft-dirty) into a skip. So instead, do the check based on architecture; for arm64, we report that soft-dirty is not supported. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230724082522.1202616-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'README')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions