diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-09-29 19:52:52 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-09-29 19:52:52 -0700 |
commit | 97f9a3c4eee55b0178b518ae7114a6a53372913d (patch) | |
tree | 03b87ee366ed32ac87b3e0919c7919c5223fda09 /Documentation | |
parent | 1eb80d6ffb1759968374606c1e36ea88e043e66d (diff) | |
parent | dc925a36060e8cef050a9d05c64dae1c30dc5027 (diff) |
Merge tag 'char-misc-5.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc
Pull Documentation/process update from Greg KH:
"Here are two small Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
file updates that missed my previous char/misc pull request.
The first one adds an Intel representative for the process, and the
second one cleans up the text a bit more when it comes to how the
disclosure rules work, as it was a bit confusing to some companies"
* tag 'char-misc-5.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc:
Documentation/process: Clarify disclosure rules
Documentation/process: Volunteer as the ambassador for Intel
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst | 42 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst b/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst index 402636356fbe..a3c3349046c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst @@ -143,6 +143,20 @@ via their employer, they cannot enter individual non-disclosure agreements in their role as Linux kernel developers. They will, however, agree to adhere to this documented process and the Memorandum of Understanding. +The disclosing party should provide a list of contacts for all other +entities who have already been, or should be, informed about the issue. +This serves several purposes: + + - The list of disclosed entities allows communication accross the + industry, e.g. other OS vendors, HW vendors, etc. + + - The disclosed entities can be contacted to name experts who should + participate in the mitigation development. + + - If an expert which is required to handle an issue is employed by an + listed entity or member of an listed entity, then the response teams can + request the disclosure of that expert from that entity. This ensures + that the expert is also part of the entity's response team. Disclosure """""""""" @@ -158,10 +172,7 @@ Mitigation development """""""""""""""""""""" The initial response team sets up an encrypted mailing-list or repurposes -an existing one if appropriate. The disclosing party should provide a list -of contacts for all other parties who have already been, or should be, -informed about the issue. The response team contacts these parties so they -can name experts who should be subscribed to the mailing-list. +an existing one if appropriate. Using a mailing-list is close to the normal Linux development process and has been successfully used in developing mitigations for various hardware @@ -175,9 +186,24 @@ development branch against the mainline kernel and backport branches for stable kernel versions as necessary. The initial response team will identify further experts from the Linux -kernel developer community as needed and inform the disclosing party about -their participation. Bringing in experts can happen at any time of the -development process and often needs to be handled in a timely manner. +kernel developer community as needed. Bringing in experts can happen at any +time of the development process and needs to be handled in a timely manner. + +If an expert is employed by or member of an entity on the disclosure list +provided by the disclosing party, then participation will be requested from +the relevant entity. + +If not, then the disclosing party will be informed about the experts +participation. The experts are covered by the Memorandum of Understanding +and the disclosing party is requested to acknowledge the participation. In +case that the disclosing party has a compelling reason to object, then this +objection has to be raised within five work days and resolved with the +incident team immediately. If the disclosing party does not react within +five work days this is taken as silent acknowledgement. + +After acknowledgement or resolution of an objection the expert is disclosed +by the incident team and brought into the development process. + Coordinated release """"""""""""""""""" @@ -216,7 +242,7 @@ an involved disclosed party. The current ambassadors list: ARM AMD IBM - Intel + Intel Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Qualcomm Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org> Microsoft Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |