// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 /* * Lockless hierarchical page accounting & limiting * * Copyright (C) 2014 Red Hat, Inc., Johannes Weiner */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include static bool track_protection(struct page_counter *c) { return c->protection_support; } static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c, unsigned long usage) { unsigned long protected, old_protected; long delta; if (!c->parent) return; protected = min(usage, READ_ONCE(c->min)); old_protected = atomic_long_read(&c->min_usage); if (protected != old_protected) { old_protected = atomic_long_xchg(&c->min_usage, protected); delta = protected - old_protected; if (delta) atomic_long_add(delta, &c->parent->children_min_usage); } protected = min(usage, READ_ONCE(c->low)); old_protected = atomic_long_read(&c->low_usage); if (protected != old_protected) { old_protected = atomic_long_xchg(&c->low_usage, protected); delta = protected - old_protected; if (delta) atomic_long_add(delta, &c->parent->children_low_usage); } } /** * page_counter_cancel - take pages out of the local counter * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: number of pages to cancel */ void page_counter_cancel(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) { long new; new = atomic_long_sub_return(nr_pages, &counter->usage); /* More uncharges than charges? */ if (WARN_ONCE(new < 0, "page_counter underflow: %ld nr_pages=%lu\n", new, nr_pages)) { new = 0; atomic_long_set(&counter->usage, new); } if (track_protection(counter)) propagate_protected_usage(counter, new); } /** * page_counter_charge - hierarchically charge pages * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: number of pages to charge * * NOTE: This does not consider any configured counter limits. */ void page_counter_charge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) { struct page_counter *c; bool protection = track_protection(counter); for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) { long new; new = atomic_long_add_return(nr_pages, &c->usage); if (protection) propagate_protected_usage(c, new); /* * This is indeed racy, but we can live with some * inaccuracy in the watermark. * * Notably, we have two watermarks to allow for both a globally * visible peak and one that can be reset at a smaller scope. * * Since we reset both watermarks when the global reset occurs, * we can guarantee that watermark >= local_watermark, so we * don't need to do both comparisons every time. * * On systems with branch predictors, the inner condition should * be almost free. */ if (new > READ_ONCE(c->local_watermark)) { WRITE_ONCE(c->local_watermark, new); if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark)) WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new); } } } /** * page_counter_try_charge - try to hierarchically charge pages * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: number of pages to charge * @fail: points first counter to hit its limit, if any * * Returns %true on success, or %false and @fail if the counter or one * of its ancestors has hit its configured limit. */ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages, struct page_counter **fail) { struct page_counter *c; bool protection = track_protection(counter); for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) { long new; /* * Charge speculatively to avoid an expensive CAS. If * a bigger charge fails, it might falsely lock out a * racing smaller charge and send it into reclaim * early, but the error is limited to the difference * between the two sizes, which is less than 2M/4M in * case of a THP locking out a regular page charge. * * The atomic_long_add_return() implies a full memory * barrier between incrementing the count and reading * the limit. When racing with page_counter_set_max(), * we either see the new limit or the setter sees the * counter has changed and retries. */ new = atomic_long_add_return(nr_pages, &c->usage); if (new > c->max) { atomic_long_sub(nr_pages, &c->usage); /* * This is racy, but we can live with some * inaccuracy in the failcnt which is only used * to report stats. */ data_race(c->failcnt++); *fail = c; goto failed; } if (protection) propagate_protected_usage(c, new); /* see comment on page_counter_charge */ if (new > READ_ONCE(c->local_watermark)) { WRITE_ONCE(c->local_watermark, new); if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark)) WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new); } } return true; failed: for (c = counter; c != *fail; c = c->parent) page_counter_cancel(c, nr_pages); return false; } /** * page_counter_uncharge - hierarchically uncharge pages * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: number of pages to uncharge */ void page_counter_uncharge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) { struct page_counter *c; for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) page_counter_cancel(c, nr_pages); } /** * page_counter_set_max - set the maximum number of pages allowed * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: limit to set * * Returns 0 on success, -EBUSY if the current number of pages on the * counter already exceeds the specified limit. * * The caller must serialize invocations on the same counter. */ int page_counter_set_max(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) { for (;;) { unsigned long old; long usage; /* * Update the limit while making sure that it's not * below the concurrently-changing counter value. * * The xchg implies two full memory barriers before * and after, so the read-swap-read is ordered and * ensures coherency with page_counter_try_charge(): * that function modifies the count before checking * the limit, so if it sees the old limit, we see the * modified counter and retry. */ usage = page_counter_read(counter); if (usage > nr_pages) return -EBUSY; old = xchg(&counter->max, nr_pages); if (page_counter_read(counter) <= usage || nr_pages >= old) return 0; counter->max = old; cond_resched(); } } /** * page_counter_set_min - set the amount of protected memory * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: value to set * * The caller must serialize invocations on the same counter. */ void page_counter_set_min(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) { struct page_counter *c; WRITE_ONCE(counter->min, nr_pages); for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) propagate_protected_usage(c, atomic_long_read(&c->usage)); } /** * page_counter_set_low - set the amount of protected memory * @counter: counter * @nr_pages: value to set * * The caller must serialize invocations on the same counter. */ void page_counter_set_low(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) { struct page_counter *c; WRITE_ONCE(counter->low, nr_pages); for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) propagate_protected_usage(c, atomic_long_read(&c->usage)); } /** * page_counter_memparse - memparse() for page counter limits * @buf: string to parse * @max: string meaning maximum possible value * @nr_pages: returns the result in number of pages * * Returns -EINVAL, or 0 and @nr_pages on success. @nr_pages will be * limited to %PAGE_COUNTER_MAX. */ int page_counter_memparse(const char *buf, const char *max, unsigned long *nr_pages) { char *end; u64 bytes; if (!strcmp(buf, max)) { *nr_pages = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX; return 0; } bytes = memparse(buf, &end); if (*end != '\0') return -EINVAL; *nr_pages = min(bytes / PAGE_SIZE, (u64)PAGE_COUNTER_MAX); return 0; } #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG /* * This function calculates an individual page counter's effective * protection which is derived from its own memory.min/low, its * parent's and siblings' settings, as well as the actual memory * distribution in the tree. * * The following rules apply to the effective protection values: * * 1. At the first level of reclaim, effective protection is equal to * the declared protection in memory.min and memory.low. * * 2. To enable safe delegation of the protection configuration, at * subsequent levels the effective protection is capped to the * parent's effective protection. * * 3. To make complex and dynamic subtrees easier to configure, the * user is allowed to overcommit the declared protection at a given * level. If that is the case, the parent's effective protection is * distributed to the children in proportion to how much protection * they have declared and how much of it they are utilizing. * * This makes distribution proportional, but also work-conserving: * if one counter claims much more protection than it uses memory, * the unused remainder is available to its siblings. * * 4. Conversely, when the declared protection is undercommitted at a * given level, the distribution of the larger parental protection * budget is NOT proportional. A counter's protection from a sibling * is capped to its own memory.min/low setting. * * 5. However, to allow protecting recursive subtrees from each other * without having to declare each individual counter's fixed share * of the ancestor's claim to protection, any unutilized - * "floating" - protection from up the tree is distributed in * proportion to each counter's *usage*. This makes the protection * neutral wrt sibling cgroups and lets them compete freely over * the shared parental protection budget, but it protects the * subtree as a whole from neighboring subtrees. * * Note that 4. and 5. are not in conflict: 4. is about protecting * against immediate siblings whereas 5. is about protecting against * neighboring subtrees. */ static unsigned long effective_protection(unsigned long usage, unsigned long parent_usage, unsigned long setting, unsigned long parent_effective, unsigned long siblings_protected, bool recursive_protection) { unsigned long protected; unsigned long ep; protected = min(usage, setting); /* * If all cgroups at this level combined claim and use more * protection than what the parent affords them, distribute * shares in proportion to utilization. * * We are using actual utilization rather than the statically * claimed protection in order to be work-conserving: claimed * but unused protection is available to siblings that would * otherwise get a smaller chunk than what they claimed. */ if (siblings_protected > parent_effective) return protected * parent_effective / siblings_protected; /* * Ok, utilized protection of all children is within what the * parent affords them, so we know whatever this child claims * and utilizes is effectively protected. * * If there is unprotected usage beyond this value, reclaim * will apply pressure in proportion to that amount. * * If there is unutilized protection, the cgroup will be fully * shielded from reclaim, but we do return a smaller value for * protection than what the group could enjoy in theory. This * is okay. With the overcommit distribution above, effective * protection is always dependent on how memory is actually * consumed among the siblings anyway. */ ep = protected; /* * If the children aren't claiming (all of) the protection * afforded to them by the parent, distribute the remainder in * proportion to the (unprotected) memory of each cgroup. That * way, cgroups that aren't explicitly prioritized wrt each * other compete freely over the allowance, but they are * collectively protected from neighboring trees. * * We're using unprotected memory for the weight so that if * some cgroups DO claim explicit protection, we don't protect * the same bytes twice. * * Check both usage and parent_usage against the respective * protected values. One should imply the other, but they * aren't read atomically - make sure the division is sane. */ if (!recursive_protection) return ep; if (parent_effective > siblings_protected && parent_usage > siblings_protected && usage > protected) { unsigned long unclaimed; unclaimed = parent_effective - siblings_protected; unclaimed *= usage - protected; unclaimed /= parent_usage - siblings_protected; ep += unclaimed; } return ep; } /** * page_counter_calculate_protection - check if memory consumption is in the normal range * @root: the top ancestor of the sub-tree being checked * @counter: the page_counter the counter to update * @recursive_protection: Whether to use memory_recursiveprot behavior. * * Calculates elow/emin thresholds for given page_counter. * * WARNING: This function is not stateless! It can only be used as part * of a top-down tree iteration, not for isolated queries. */ void page_counter_calculate_protection(struct page_counter *root, struct page_counter *counter, bool recursive_protection) { unsigned long usage, parent_usage; struct page_counter *parent = counter->parent; /* * Effective values of the reclaim targets are ignored so they * can be stale. Have a look at mem_cgroup_protection for more * details. * TODO: calculation should be more robust so that we do not need * that special casing. */ if (root == counter) return; usage = page_counter_read(counter); if (!usage) return; if (parent == root) { counter->emin = READ_ONCE(counter->min); counter->elow = READ_ONCE(counter->low); return; } parent_usage = page_counter_read(parent); WRITE_ONCE(counter->emin, effective_protection(usage, parent_usage, READ_ONCE(counter->min), READ_ONCE(parent->emin), atomic_long_read(&parent->children_min_usage), recursive_protection)); WRITE_ONCE(counter->elow, effective_protection(usage, parent_usage, READ_ONCE(counter->low), READ_ONCE(parent->elow), atomic_long_read(&parent->children_low_usage), recursive_protection)); } #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */