From 7ada4db88634429f4da690ad1c4eb73c93085f0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:11:32 +0100
Subject: vfs: count unlinked inodes

Add a new counter to the superblock that keeps track of unlinked but
not yet deleted inodes.

Do not WARN_ON if set_nlink is called with zero count, just do a
ratelimited printk.  This happens on xfs and probably other
filesystems after an unclean shutdown when the filesystem reads inodes
which already have zero i_nlink.  Reported by Christoph Hellwig.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/inode.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)

(limited to 'fs/inode.c')

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 961355d00e38..87535753ab04 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/ima.h>
 #include <linux/cred.h>
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* for inode_has_buffers */
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
 /*
@@ -242,6 +243,11 @@ void __destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	BUG_ON(inode_has_buffers(inode));
 	security_inode_free(inode);
 	fsnotify_inode_delete(inode);
+	if (!inode->i_nlink) {
+		WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count) == 0);
+		atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+	}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
 	if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
 		posix_acl_release(inode->i_acl);
@@ -268,6 +274,85 @@ static void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback);
 }
 
+/**
+ * drop_nlink - directly drop an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  In cases
+ * where we are attempting to track writes to the
+ * filesystem, a decrement to zero means an imminent
+ * write when the file is truncated and actually unlinked
+ * on the filesystem.
+ */
+void drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	WARN_ON(inode->i_nlink == 0);
+	inode->__i_nlink--;
+	if (!inode->i_nlink)
+		atomic_long_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drop_nlink);
+
+/**
+ * clear_nlink - directly zero an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  See
+ * drop_nlink() for why we care about i_nlink hitting zero.
+ */
+void clear_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (inode->i_nlink) {
+		inode->__i_nlink = 0;
+		atomic_long_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_nlink);
+
+/**
+ * set_nlink - directly set an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ * @nlink: new nlink (should be non-zero)
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.
+ */
+void set_nlink(struct inode *inode, unsigned int nlink)
+{
+	if (!nlink) {
+		printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
+			"set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on %s inode %li\n",
+			inode->i_sb->s_type->name, inode->i_ino);
+		clear_nlink(inode);
+	} else {
+		/* Yes, some filesystems do change nlink from zero to one */
+		if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
+			atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+
+		inode->__i_nlink = nlink;
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_nlink);
+
+/**
+ * inc_nlink - directly increment an inode's link count
+ * @inode: inode
+ *
+ * This is a low-level filesystem helper to replace any
+ * direct filesystem manipulation of i_nlink.  Currently,
+ * it is only here for parity with dec_nlink().
+ */
+void inc_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(inode->i_nlink == 0))
+		atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
+
+	inode->__i_nlink++;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_nlink);
+
 void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	memset(mapping, 0, sizeof(*mapping));
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151