From 3fa421dedbc82f985f030c5a6480ea2d784334c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:01:17 -0400 Subject: btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device remove When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the ->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up. Unfortunately during device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock: ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11595: #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ioctl.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 41524f9aeac3..cc61813213d8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -3223,6 +3223,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev_v2(struct file *file, void __user *arg) struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb); struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2 *vol_args; + struct block_device *bdev = NULL; + fmode_t mode; int ret; bool cancel = false; @@ -3255,9 +3257,9 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev_v2(struct file *file, void __user *arg) /* Exclusive operation is now claimed */ if (vol_args->flags & BTRFS_DEVICE_SPEC_BY_ID) - ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, NULL, vol_args->devid); + ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, NULL, vol_args->devid, &bdev, &mode); else - ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0); + ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0, &bdev, &mode); btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info); @@ -3273,6 +3275,8 @@ out: kfree(vol_args); err_drop: mnt_drop_write_file(file); + if (bdev) + blkdev_put(bdev, mode); return ret; } @@ -3281,6 +3285,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg) struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb); struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol_args; + struct block_device *bdev = NULL; + fmode_t mode; int ret; bool cancel; @@ -3302,7 +3308,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg) ret = exclop_start_or_cancel_reloc(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_REMOVE, cancel); if (ret == 0) { - ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0); + ret = btrfs_rm_device(fs_info, vol_args->name, 0, &bdev, &mode); if (!ret) btrfs_info(fs_info, "disk deleted %s", vol_args->name); btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info); @@ -3311,7 +3317,8 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg) kfree(vol_args); out_drop_write: mnt_drop_write_file(file); - + if (bdev) + blkdev_put(bdev, mode); return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151