From b0c1ef52959582144bbea9a2b37db7f4c9e399f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:14:17 -0800 Subject: perf/x86: Fix exclusion of BTS and LBR for Goldmont An earlier patch allowed enabling PT and LBR at the same time on Goldmont. However it also allowed enabling BTS and LBR at the same time, which is still not supported. Fix this by bypassing the check only for PT. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: alexander.shishkin@intel.com Cc: kan.liang@intel.com Cc: Fixes: ccbebba4c6bf ("perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209001417.4713-1-andi@firstfloor.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/events/core.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/events/core.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c index 6e395c996900..7fe88bb57e36 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c @@ -365,7 +365,11 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what) { int i; - if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist) + /* + * When lbr_pt_coexist we allow PT to coexist with either LBR or BTS. + * LBR and BTS are still mutually exclusive. + */ + if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist && what == x86_lbr_exclusive_pt) return 0; if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what])) { @@ -388,7 +392,7 @@ fail_unlock: void x86_del_exclusive(unsigned int what) { - if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist) + if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist && what == x86_lbr_exclusive_pt) return; atomic_dec(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what]); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151