diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-11-08 09:21:18 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-11-08 09:21:18 -0800 |
commit | d46392bbf5c6ce594669f00b8177f0b34e983f90 (patch) | |
tree | a17dbb2f9d0ee6efafb13c340ef03330bc21fcfc /tools/testing | |
parent | 305230142ae0637213bf6e04f6d9f10bbcb74af8 (diff) | |
parent | e1c05b3bf80f829ced464bdca90f1dfa96e8d251 (diff) |
Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-6.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux
Pull RISC-V updates from Palmer Dabbelt:
- Support for cbo.zero in userspace
- Support for CBOs on ACPI-based systems
- A handful of improvements for the T-Head cache flushing ops
- Support for software shadow call stacks
- Various cleanups and fixes
* tag 'riscv-for-linus-6.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux: (31 commits)
RISC-V: hwprobe: Fix vDSO SIGSEGV
riscv: configs: defconfig: Enable configs required for RZ/Five SoC
riscv: errata: prefix T-Head mnemonics with th.
riscv: put interrupt entries into .irqentry.text
riscv: mm: Update the comment of CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET
riscv: Using TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE marco replace zihintpause
riscv/mm: Fix the comment for swap pte format
RISC-V: clarify the QEMU workaround in ISA parser
riscv: correct pt_level name via pgtable_l5/4_enabled
RISC-V: Provide pgtable_l5_enabled on rv32
clocksource: timer-riscv: Increase rating of clock_event_device for Sstc
clocksource: timer-riscv: Don't enable/disable timer interrupt
lkdtm: Fix CFI_BACKWARD on RISC-V
riscv: Use separate IRQ shadow call stacks
riscv: Implement Shadow Call Stack
riscv: Move global pointer loading to a macro
riscv: Deduplicate IRQ stack switching
riscv: VMAP_STACK overflow detection thread-safe
RISC-V: cacheflush: Initialize CBO variables on ACPI systems
RISC-V: ACPI: RHCT: Add function to get CBO block sizes
...
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c | 228 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c | 64 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h | 15 |
4 files changed, 270 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile index ebdbb3c22e54..f224b84591fb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile @@ -2,9 +2,14 @@ # Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited # Originally tools/testing/arm64/abi/Makefile -TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe +CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/include + +TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe cbo include ../../lib.mk $(OUTPUT)/hwprobe: hwprobe.c sys_hwprobe.S - $(CC) -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ + $(CC) -static -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ + +$(OUTPUT)/cbo: cbo.c sys_hwprobe.S + $(CC) -static -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..50a2cc8aef38 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c @@ -0,0 +1,228 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (c) 2023 Ventana Micro Systems Inc. + * + * Run with 'taskset -c <cpu-list> cbo' to only execute hwprobe on a + * subset of cpus, as well as only executing the tests on those cpus. + */ +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <stdint.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <sched.h> +#include <signal.h> +#include <assert.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <asm/ucontext.h> + +#include "hwprobe.h" +#include "../../kselftest.h" + +#define MK_CBO(fn) cpu_to_le32((fn) << 20 | 10 << 15 | 2 << 12 | 0 << 7 | 15) + +static char mem[4096] __aligned(4096) = { [0 ... 4095] = 0xa5 }; + +static bool illegal_insn; + +static void sigill_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *context) +{ + unsigned long *regs = (unsigned long *)&((ucontext_t *)context)->uc_mcontext; + uint32_t insn = *(uint32_t *)regs[0]; + + assert(insn == MK_CBO(regs[11])); + + illegal_insn = true; + regs[0] += 4; +} + +static void cbo_insn(char *base, int fn) +{ + uint32_t insn = MK_CBO(fn); + + asm volatile( + "mv a0, %0\n" + "li a1, %1\n" + ".4byte %2\n" + : : "r" (base), "i" (fn), "i" (insn) : "a0", "a1", "memory"); +} + +static void cbo_inval(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 0); } +static void cbo_clean(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 1); } +static void cbo_flush(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 2); } +static void cbo_zero(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 4); } + +static void test_no_zicbom(void *arg) +{ + ksft_print_msg("Testing Zicbom instructions remain privileged\n"); + + illegal_insn = false; + cbo_clean(&mem[0]); + ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.clean\n"); + + illegal_insn = false; + cbo_flush(&mem[0]); + ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.flush\n"); + + illegal_insn = false; + cbo_inval(&mem[0]); + ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.inval\n"); +} + +static void test_no_zicboz(void *arg) +{ + ksft_print_msg("No Zicboz, testing cbo.zero remains privileged\n"); + + illegal_insn = false; + cbo_zero(&mem[0]); + ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.zero\n"); +} + +static bool is_power_of_2(__u64 n) +{ + return n != 0 && (n & (n - 1)) == 0; +} + +static void test_zicboz(void *arg) +{ + struct riscv_hwprobe pair = { + .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE, + }; + cpu_set_t *cpus = (cpu_set_t *)arg; + __u64 block_size; + int i, j; + long rc; + + rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)cpus, 0); + block_size = pair.value; + ksft_test_result(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE && + is_power_of_2(block_size), "Zicboz block size\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Zicboz block size: %ld\n", block_size); + + illegal_insn = false; + cbo_zero(&mem[block_size]); + ksft_test_result(!illegal_insn, "cbo.zero\n"); + + if (illegal_insn || !is_power_of_2(block_size)) { + ksft_test_result_skip("cbo.zero check\n"); + return; + } + + assert(block_size <= 1024); + + for (i = 0; i < 4096 / block_size; ++i) { + if (i % 2) + cbo_zero(&mem[i * block_size]); + } + + for (i = 0; i < 4096 / block_size; ++i) { + char expected = i % 2 ? 0x0 : 0xa5; + + for (j = 0; j < block_size; ++j) { + if (mem[i * block_size + j] != expected) { + ksft_test_result_fail("cbo.zero check\n"); + ksft_print_msg("cbo.zero check: mem[%d] != 0x%x\n", + i * block_size + j, expected); + return; + } + } + } + + ksft_test_result_pass("cbo.zero check\n"); +} + +static void check_no_zicboz_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus) +{ + struct riscv_hwprobe pair = { + .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0, + }; + cpu_set_t one_cpu; + int i = 0, c = 0; + long rc; + + while (i++ < CPU_COUNT(cpus)) { + while (!CPU_ISSET(c, cpus)) + ++c; + + CPU_ZERO(&one_cpu); + CPU_SET(c, &one_cpu); + + rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)&one_cpu, 0); + assert(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0); + + if (pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Zicboz is only present on a subset of harts.\n" + "Use taskset to select a set of harts where Zicboz\n" + "presence (present or not) is consistent for each hart\n"); + ++c; + } +} + +enum { + TEST_ZICBOZ, + TEST_NO_ZICBOZ, + TEST_NO_ZICBOM, +}; + +static struct test_info { + bool enabled; + unsigned int nr_tests; + void (*test_fn)(void *arg); +} tests[] = { + [TEST_ZICBOZ] = { .nr_tests = 3, test_zicboz }, + [TEST_NO_ZICBOZ] = { .nr_tests = 1, test_no_zicboz }, + [TEST_NO_ZICBOM] = { .nr_tests = 3, test_no_zicbom }, +}; + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + struct sigaction act = { + .sa_sigaction = &sigill_handler, + .sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO, + }; + struct riscv_hwprobe pair; + unsigned int plan = 0; + cpu_set_t cpus; + long rc; + int i; + + if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "--sigill")) { + rc = sigaction(SIGILL, &act, NULL); + assert(rc == 0); + tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOZ].enabled = true; + tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOM].enabled = true; + } + + rc = sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpus); + assert(rc == 0); + + ksft_print_header(); + + pair.key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0; + rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)&cpus, 0); + if (rc < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("hwprobe() failed with %d\n", rc); + assert(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0); + + if (pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ) { + tests[TEST_ZICBOZ].enabled = true; + tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOZ].enabled = false; + } else { + check_no_zicboz_cpus(&cpus); + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i) + plan += tests[i].enabled ? tests[i].nr_tests : 0; + + if (plan == 0) + ksft_print_msg("No tests enabled.\n"); + else + ksft_set_plan(plan); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i) { + if (tests[i].enabled) + tests[i].test_fn(&cpus); + } + + ksft_finished(); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c index 09f290a67420..c474891df307 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c @@ -1,14 +1,6 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only -#include <stddef.h> -#include <asm/hwprobe.h> - -/* - * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it - * ourselves. This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to - * contain the call. - */ -long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count, - size_t cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags); +#include "hwprobe.h" +#include "../../kselftest.h" int main(int argc, char **argv) { @@ -16,6 +8,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) unsigned long cpus; long out; + ksft_print_header(); + ksft_set_plan(5); + /* Fake the CPU_SET ops. */ cpus = -1; @@ -25,13 +20,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) */ for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++) pairs[i].key = i; + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, &cpus, 0); if (out != 0) - return -1; + ksft_exit_fail_msg("hwprobe() failed with %ld\n", out); + for (long i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { /* Fail if the kernel claims not to recognize a base key. */ if ((i < 4) && (pairs[i].key != i)) - return -2; + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to recognize base key: key != i, " + "key=%ld, i=%ld\n", pairs[i].key, i); if (pairs[i].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR) continue; @@ -39,52 +37,30 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (pairs[i].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA) continue; - return -3; + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected pair: (%ld, %ld)\n", pairs[i].key, pairs[i].value); } - /* - * This should also work with a NULL CPU set, but should not work - * with an improperly supplied CPU set. - */ out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, 0, 0); - if (out != 0) - return -4; + ksft_test_result(out == 0, "NULL CPU set\n"); out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, &cpus, 0); - if (out == 0) - return -5; + ksft_test_result(out != 0, "Bad CPU set\n"); out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0); - if (out == 0) - return -6; + ksft_test_result(out != 0, "NULL CPU set with non-zero count\n"); - /* - * Check that keys work by providing one that we know exists, and - * checking to make sure the resultig pair is what we asked for. - */ pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR; out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0); - if (out != 0) - return -7; - if (pairs[0].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR) - return -8; + ksft_test_result(out == 0 && pairs[0].key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR, + "Existing key is maintained\n"); - /* - * Check that an unknown key gets overwritten with -1, - * but doesn't block elements after it. - */ pairs[0].key = 0x5555; pairs[1].key = 1; pairs[1].value = 0xAAAA; out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 2, 0, 0, 0); - if (out != 0) - return -9; - - if (pairs[0].key != -1) - return -10; - - if ((pairs[1].key != 1) || (pairs[1].value == 0xAAAA)) - return -11; + ksft_test_result(out == 0 && pairs[0].key == -1 && + pairs[1].key == 1 && pairs[1].value != 0xAAAA, + "Unknown key overwritten with -1 and doesn't block other elements\n"); - return 0; + ksft_finished(); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..721b0ce73a56 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +#ifndef SELFTEST_RISCV_HWPROBE_H +#define SELFTEST_RISCV_HWPROBE_H +#include <stddef.h> +#include <asm/hwprobe.h> + +/* + * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it + * ourselves. This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to + * contain the call. + */ +long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count, + size_t cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags); + +#endif |