From 7a474c36586f4277f930ab7e6865c97e44dfc3bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Westphal Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 14:17:01 +0100 Subject: xfrm: policy: increment xfrm_hash_generation on hash rebuild Hash rebuild will re-set all the inexact entries, then re-insert them. Lookups that can occur in parallel will therefore not find any policies. This was safe when lookups were still guarded by rwlock. After rcu-ification, lookups check the hash_generation seqcount to detect when a hash resize takes place. Hash rebuild missed the needed increment. Hash resizes and hash rebuilds cannot occur in parallel (both acquire hash_resize_mutex), so just increment xfrm_hash_generation, like resize. Fixes: a7c44247f704e3 ("xfrm: policy: make xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype lockless") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'net/xfrm') diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 628b389af2ba..d8fba27a4bfb 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -1235,6 +1235,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work) } while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, seq)); spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation); /* make sure that we can insert the indirect policies again before * we start with destructive action. @@ -1334,6 +1335,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work) out_unlock: __xfrm_policy_inexact_flush(net); + write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation); spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151