From b41d7cfef5696b4fb17a122d16e2fbf2a3bc0d9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 23:51:39 +0100 Subject: rxrpc: Fix undefined packet handling By analogy with other Rx implementations, RxRPC packet types 9, 10 and 11 should just be discarded rather than being aborted like other undefined packet types. Reported-by: Jeffrey Altman Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/rxrpc/protocol.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'net/rxrpc/protocol.h') diff --git a/net/rxrpc/protocol.h b/net/rxrpc/protocol.h index 4bddcf3face3..93da73bf7098 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/protocol.h +++ b/net/rxrpc/protocol.h @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ struct rxrpc_wire_header { #define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_CHALLENGE 6 /* connection security challenge (SRVR->CLNT) */ #define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_RESPONSE 7 /* connection secutity response (CLNT->SRVR) */ #define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_DEBUG 8 /* debug info request */ +#define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_PARAMS 9 /* Parameter negotiation (unspec'd, ignore) */ +#define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_10 10 /* Ignored */ +#define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_11 11 /* Ignored */ #define RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_VERSION 13 /* version string request */ #define RXRPC_N_PACKET_TYPES 14 /* number of packet types (incl type 0) */ @@ -78,6 +81,9 @@ struct rxrpc_wire_header { (1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_CHALLENGE) | \ (1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_RESPONSE) | \ /*(1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_DEBUG) | */ \ + (1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_PARAMS) | \ + (1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_10) | \ + (1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_11) | \ (1 << RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_VERSION)) /*****************************************************************************/ -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151