From 95c354fe9f7d6decc08a92aa26eb233ecc2155bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Piggin Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:31:20 +0100 Subject: spinlock: lockbreak cleanup The break_lock data structure and code for spinlocks is quite nasty. Not only does it double the size of a spinlock but it changes locking to a potentially less optimal trylock. Put all of that under CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK, and introduce a __raw_spin_is_contended that uses the lock data itself to determine whether there are waiters on the lock, to be used if CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is not set. Rename need_lockbreak to spin_needbreak, make it use spin_is_contended to decouple it from the spinlock implementation, and make it typesafe (rwlocks do not have any need_lockbreak sites -- why do they even get bloated up with that break_lock then?). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- mm/memory.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 4b0144b24c12..673ebbf499c7 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -513,8 +513,7 @@ again: if (progress >= 32) { progress = 0; if (need_resched() || - need_lockbreak(src_ptl) || - need_lockbreak(dst_ptl)) + spin_needbreak(src_ptl) || spin_needbreak(dst_ptl)) break; } if (pte_none(*src_pte)) { @@ -853,7 +852,7 @@ unsigned long unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather **tlbp, tlb_finish_mmu(*tlbp, tlb_start, start); if (need_resched() || - (i_mmap_lock && need_lockbreak(i_mmap_lock))) { + (i_mmap_lock && spin_needbreak(i_mmap_lock))) { if (i_mmap_lock) { *tlbp = NULL; goto out; @@ -1768,8 +1767,7 @@ again: restart_addr = zap_page_range(vma, start_addr, end_addr - start_addr, details); - need_break = need_resched() || - need_lockbreak(details->i_mmap_lock); + need_break = need_resched() || spin_needbreak(details->i_mmap_lock); if (restart_addr >= end_addr) { /* We have now completed this vma: mark it so */ -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151