From 534b483a86e6b96f1b5cc03bbe4b696f3daead6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:48:04 -0700 Subject: cpumask: don't perform while loop in cpumask_next_and() cpumask_next_and() is looking for cpumask_next() in src1 in a loop and tests if found cpu is also present in src2. remove that loop, perform cpumask_and() of src1 and src2 first and use that new mask to find cpumask_next(). Apart from removing while loop, ./bloat-o-meter on x86_64 shows add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-8 (-8) function old new delta cpumask_next_and 62 54 -8 Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Amir Vadai Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- lib/cpumask.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c index b6513a9f2892..5ab1553fd076 100644 --- a/lib/cpumask.c +++ b/lib/cpumask.c @@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr); int cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *src1p, const struct cpumask *src2p) { - while ((n = cpumask_next(n, src1p)) < nr_cpu_ids) - if (cpumask_test_cpu(n, src2p)) - break; - return n; + struct cpumask tmp; + + if (cpumask_and(&tmp, src1p, src2p)) + return cpumask_next(n, &tmp); + return nr_cpu_ids; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_next_and); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151