From af68cb3fc736e13e66fc8202ea94c3aff7299f39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anna-Maria Behnsen Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:05:36 +0100 Subject: timers: Simplify code in run_local_timers() The logic for raising a softirq the way it is implemented right now, is readable for two timer bases. When increasing the number of timer bases, code gets harder to read. With the introduction of the timer migration hierarchy, there will be three timer bases. Therefore restructure the code to use a loop. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221090548.36600-9-anna-maria@linutronix.de --- kernel/time/timer.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time') diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c index 121f5b99ea21..9c8443d4fe33 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timer.c +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c @@ -2180,16 +2180,14 @@ static void run_local_timers(void) struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]); hrtimer_run_queues(); - /* Raise the softirq only if required. */ - if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) { - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)) - return; - /* CPU is awake, so check the deferrable base. */ - base++; - if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) + + for (int i = 0; i < NR_BASES; i++, base++) { + /* Raise the softirq only if required. */ + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) { + raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ); return; + } } - raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ); } /* -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151