From f53bd1421b3eb84375e9e6964665d23d4190400d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:17:32 -0400 Subject: __ufs_truncate_blocks(): avoid excessive dirtying of indirect blocks There's a case when an indirect block gets dirtied for no good reason - when there's a hole starting in the middle of area covered by it and spanning past its end, and truncate() is done precisely to the beginning of the hole. The block is obviously not modified at all - all removals happen beyond it. However, existing code ends up dirtying it just in case. It's trivial to fix and while it's not a real bug by any stretch of imagination, it makes the damn thing harder to follow. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ufs/inode.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ufs') diff --git a/fs/ufs/inode.c b/fs/ufs/inode.c index 424949f459c8..86cc1eea0fb2 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ufs/inode.c @@ -1251,10 +1251,8 @@ static void __ufs_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode) } p = ubh_get_data_ptr(uspi, ubh[i], offsets[i + 1]); } - while (i--) { - ubh_mark_buffer_dirty(ubh[i]); + while (i--) free_branch_tail(inode, offsets[i + 1], ubh[i], depth - i - 1); - } } for (i = offsets[0]; i <= UFS_TIND_BLOCK; i++) { p = ufs_get_direct_data_ptr(uspi, ufsi, i); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151