From 61e0d47c33cc371f725bcda4a47ae0efe652dba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:48:41 +0200 Subject: splice: add helpers for locking pipe inode There are lots of sequences like this, especially in splice code: if (pipe->inode) mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); /* do something */ if (pipe->inode) mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); so introduce helpers which do the conditional locking and unlocking. Also replace the inode_double_lock() call with a pipe_double_lock() helper to avoid spreading the use of this functionality beyond the pipe code. This patch is just a cleanup, and should cause no behavioral changes. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- fs/splice.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/splice.c') diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c index 128ee36a719b..5384a90665d0 100644 --- a/fs/splice.c +++ b/fs/splice.c @@ -182,8 +182,7 @@ ssize_t splice_to_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, do_wakeup = 0; page_nr = 0; - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_lock(pipe); for (;;) { if (!pipe->readers) { @@ -245,15 +244,13 @@ ssize_t splice_to_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, pipe->waiting_writers--; } - if (pipe->inode) { - mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_unlock(pipe); - if (do_wakeup) { - smp_mb(); - if (waitqueue_active(&pipe->wait)) - wake_up_interruptible(&pipe->wait); - kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN); - } + if (do_wakeup) { + smp_mb(); + if (waitqueue_active(&pipe->wait)) + wake_up_interruptible(&pipe->wait); + kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN); } while (page_nr < spd_pages) @@ -801,11 +798,9 @@ ssize_t splice_from_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct file *out, .u.file = out, }; - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_lock(pipe); ret = __splice_from_pipe(pipe, &sd, actor); - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_unlock(pipe); return ret; } @@ -837,8 +832,7 @@ generic_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct file *out, }; ssize_t ret; - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_lock_nested(&pipe->inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT); + pipe_lock(pipe); splice_from_pipe_begin(&sd); do { @@ -854,8 +848,7 @@ generic_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct file *out, } while (ret > 0); splice_from_pipe_end(pipe, &sd); - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_unlock(pipe); if (sd.num_spliced) ret = sd.num_spliced; @@ -1348,8 +1341,7 @@ static long vmsplice_to_user(struct file *file, const struct iovec __user *iov, if (!pipe) return -EBADF; - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_lock(pipe); error = ret = 0; while (nr_segs) { @@ -1404,8 +1396,7 @@ static long vmsplice_to_user(struct file *file, const struct iovec __user *iov, iov++; } - if (pipe->inode) - mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_unlock(pipe); if (!ret) ret = error; @@ -1533,7 +1524,7 @@ static int link_ipipe_prep(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int flags) return 0; ret = 0; - mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_lock(pipe); while (!pipe->nrbufs) { if (signal_pending(current)) { @@ -1551,7 +1542,7 @@ static int link_ipipe_prep(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int flags) pipe_wait(pipe); } - mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_unlock(pipe); return ret; } @@ -1571,7 +1562,7 @@ static int link_opipe_prep(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int flags) return 0; ret = 0; - mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_lock(pipe); while (pipe->nrbufs >= PIPE_BUFFERS) { if (!pipe->readers) { @@ -1592,7 +1583,7 @@ static int link_opipe_prep(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int flags) pipe->waiting_writers--; } - mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex); + pipe_unlock(pipe); return ret; } @@ -1608,10 +1599,10 @@ static int link_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *ipipe, /* * Potential ABBA deadlock, work around it by ordering lock - * grabbing by inode address. Otherwise two different processes + * grabbing by pipe info address. Otherwise two different processes * could deadlock (one doing tee from A -> B, the other from B -> A). */ - inode_double_lock(ipipe->inode, opipe->inode); + pipe_double_lock(ipipe, opipe); do { if (!opipe->readers) { @@ -1662,7 +1653,8 @@ static int link_pipe(struct pipe_inode_info *ipipe, if (!ret && ipipe->waiting_writers && (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)) ret = -EAGAIN; - inode_double_unlock(ipipe->inode, opipe->inode); + pipe_unlock(ipipe); + pipe_unlock(opipe); /* * If we put data in the output pipe, wakeup any potential readers. -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151