From f0cb0f0bca233935ac70707d47f5885419a7fd31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:06:53 -0800
Subject: fs/ocfs2/file.c: fix wrong comment

Unwritten extent only exists for file systems which support holes.  But
the comment said was opposite meaning and also the comment is not very
clear, so rephase it.

Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/ocfs2')

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
index 67c037af301a..6fff128cad16 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
 	int did_quota = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * This function only exists for file systems which don't
+	 * Unwritten extent only exists for file systems which
 	 * support holes.
 	 */
 	BUG_ON(mark_unwritten && !ocfs2_sparse_alloc(osb));
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151