From 1a1d92c10dd24bbdc28b3d6e2d03ec199dd3a65b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexey Dobriyan Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:49:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Really ignore kmem_cache_destroy return value * Rougly half of callers already do it by not checking return value * Code in drivers/acpi/osl.c does the following to be sure: (void)kmem_cache_destroy(cache); * Those who check it printk something, however, slab_error already printed the name of failed cache. * XFS BUGs on failed kmem_cache_destroy which is not the decision low-level filesystem driver should make. Converted to ignore. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/hfsplus/super.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/hfsplus/super.c') diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/super.c b/fs/hfsplus/super.c index d279d5924f28..194eede52fa4 100644 --- a/fs/hfsplus/super.c +++ b/fs/hfsplus/super.c @@ -493,8 +493,7 @@ static int __init init_hfsplus_fs(void) static void __exit exit_hfsplus_fs(void) { unregister_filesystem(&hfsplus_fs_type); - if (kmem_cache_destroy(hfsplus_inode_cachep)) - printk(KERN_ERR "hfsplus_inode_cache: not all structures were freed\n"); + kmem_cache_destroy(hfsplus_inode_cachep); } module_init(init_hfsplus_fs) -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151