From e1860a7724828a341037b010b3f4ff58bad53f95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 14:11:38 +0200 Subject: btrfs: GFP_NOFS does not GFP_HIGHMEM Masking HIGHMEM out of NOFS does not make sense. Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent_io.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index d22b0777c7e0..d02a637530b1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4815,7 +4815,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, return NULL; eb->fs_info = fs_info; again: - ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM); + ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS); if (ret) goto free_eb; spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock); @@ -4916,7 +4916,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, if (uptodate) set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags); again: - ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM); + ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS); if (ret) goto free_eb; -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151