From 743cde7419bc9580a71a7e6f15eda66d6d8e71c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 16:56:19 -0500 Subject: bfs_add_entry(): get rid of pointless ->d_name.len checks First of all, any dentry getting here would have passed bfs_lookup(), so it it passed ENAMETOOLONG check there, there's no need to repeat it. And we are not going to get dentries with zero name length - that check ultimately comes from ext2 and it's as pointless here as it used to be there. Acked-by: Tigran Aivazian Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/bfs/dir.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/bfs') diff --git a/fs/bfs/dir.c b/fs/bfs/dir.c index fbc4ae80a4b2..c375e22c4c0c 100644 --- a/fs/bfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/bfs/dir.c @@ -275,11 +275,6 @@ static int bfs_add_entry(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *child, int ino) dprintf("name=%s, namelen=%d\n", name, namelen); - if (!namelen) - return -ENOENT; - if (namelen > BFS_NAMELEN) - return -ENAMETOOLONG; - sblock = BFS_I(dir)->i_sblock; eblock = BFS_I(dir)->i_eblock; for (block = sblock; block <= eblock; block++) { -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151