From a4f08141d0b876407ca4e4b0ae1b2dec35851532 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:10:47 -0700 Subject: drivers/ata: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock pair. This commit therefore eliminates the spin_unlock_wait() call and associated else-clause and hoists the then-clause's lock and unlock out of the "if" statement. This should be safe from a performance perspective because according to Tejun there should be few if any drivers that don't set their own error handler. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alan Stern Cc: Andrea Parri Cc: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c index b70bcf6d2914..b325db27eb8c 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c @@ -645,12 +645,11 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap, * completions are honored. A scmd is determined to have * timed out iff its associated qc is active and not failed. */ + spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags); if (ap->ops->error_handler) { struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp; int nr_timedout = 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags); - /* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler @@ -700,12 +699,11 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap, if (nr_timedout) __ata_port_freeze(ap); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags); /* initialize eh_tries */ ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES; - } else - spin_unlock_wait(ap->lock); + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151