From 0e48f51cbbfbdb79149806de14dcb8bf0f01ca94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mika Westerberg Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:00:25 +0300 Subject: Revert "libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen" This reverts commit 85fbd722ad0f5d64d1ad15888cd1eb2188bfb557. The commit was added as a quick band-aid for a hang that happened when a block device was removed during system suspend. Now that bdi_wq is not freezable anymore the hang should not be possible and we can get rid of this hack by reverting it. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 21 --------------------- 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c index 76d0f9de767b..58e09ffe8b9c 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c @@ -4791,27 +4791,6 @@ void ata_scsi_hotplug(struct work_struct *work) return; } - /* - * XXX - UGLY HACK - * - * The block layer suspend/resume path is fundamentally broken due - * to freezable kthreads and workqueue and may deadlock if a block - * device gets removed while resume is in progress. I don't know - * what the solution is short of removing freezable kthreads and - * workqueues altogether. - * - * The following is an ugly hack to avoid kicking off device - * removal while freezer is active. This is a joke but does avoid - * this particular deadlock scenario. - * - * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62801 - * http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138695698516487 - */ -#ifdef CONFIG_FREEZER - while (pm_freezing) - msleep(10); -#endif - DPRINTK("ENTER\n"); mutex_lock(&ap->scsi_scan_mutex); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151 From 09d6ac8dc51a033ae0043c1fe40b4d02563c2496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:54:17 -0700 Subject: libata/ahci: Fix PCS quirk application Commit c312ef176399 "libata/ahci: Drop PCS quirk for Denverton and beyond" got the polarity wrong on the check for which board-ids should have the quirk applied. The board type board_ahci_pcs7 is defined at the end of the list such that "pcs7" boards can be special cased in the future if they need the quirk. All prior Intel board ids "< board_ahci_pcs7" should proceed with applying the quirk. Reported-by: Andreas Friedrich Reported-by: Stephen Douthit Fixes: c312ef176399 ("libata/ahci: Drop PCS quirk for Denverton and beyond") Cc: Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- drivers/ata/ahci.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata') diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c index dd92faf197d5..05c2b32dcc4d 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c @@ -1600,7 +1600,9 @@ static void ahci_intel_pcs_quirk(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct ahci_host_priv *hp */ if (!id || id->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL) return; - if (((enum board_ids) id->driver_data) < board_ahci_pcs7) + + /* Skip applying the quirk on Denverton and beyond */ + if (((enum board_ids) id->driver_data) >= board_ahci_pcs7) return; /* -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151 From 962399bb7fbf5ce0c5b768ca7115614f31ff8f3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:51:05 +0100 Subject: ata: libahci_platform: Fix regulator_get_optional() misuse This driver is using regulator_get_optional() to handle all the supplies that it handles, and only ever enables and disables all supplies en masse without ever doing any other configuration of the device to handle missing power. These are clear signs that the API is being misused - it should only be used for supplies that may be physically absent from the system and in these cases the hardware usually needs different configuration if the supply is missing. Instead use normal regualtor_get(), if the supply is not described in DT then the framework will substitute a dummy regulator in so no special handling is needed by the consumer driver. In the case of the PHY regulator the handling in the driver is a hack to deal with integrated PHYs; the supplies are only optional in the sense that that there's some confusion in the code about where they're bound to. From a code point of view they function exactly as normal supplies so can be treated as such. It'd probably be better to model this by instantiating a PHY object for integrated PHYs. Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 38 ++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c index e742780950de..8befce036af8 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c @@ -153,17 +153,13 @@ int ahci_platform_enable_regulators(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv) { int rc, i; - if (hpriv->ahci_regulator) { - rc = regulator_enable(hpriv->ahci_regulator); - if (rc) - return rc; - } + rc = regulator_enable(hpriv->ahci_regulator); + if (rc) + return rc; - if (hpriv->phy_regulator) { - rc = regulator_enable(hpriv->phy_regulator); - if (rc) - goto disable_ahci_pwrs; - } + rc = regulator_enable(hpriv->phy_regulator); + if (rc) + goto disable_ahci_pwrs; for (i = 0; i < hpriv->nports; i++) { if (!hpriv->target_pwrs[i]) @@ -181,11 +177,9 @@ disable_target_pwrs: if (hpriv->target_pwrs[i]) regulator_disable(hpriv->target_pwrs[i]); - if (hpriv->phy_regulator) - regulator_disable(hpriv->phy_regulator); + regulator_disable(hpriv->phy_regulator); disable_ahci_pwrs: - if (hpriv->ahci_regulator) - regulator_disable(hpriv->ahci_regulator); + regulator_disable(hpriv->ahci_regulator); return rc; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ahci_platform_enable_regulators); @@ -207,10 +201,8 @@ void ahci_platform_disable_regulators(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv) regulator_disable(hpriv->target_pwrs[i]); } - if (hpriv->ahci_regulator) - regulator_disable(hpriv->ahci_regulator); - if (hpriv->phy_regulator) - regulator_disable(hpriv->phy_regulator); + regulator_disable(hpriv->ahci_regulator); + regulator_disable(hpriv->phy_regulator); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ahci_platform_disable_regulators); /** @@ -359,7 +351,7 @@ static int ahci_platform_get_regulator(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv, u32 port, struct regulator *target_pwr; int rc = 0; - target_pwr = regulator_get_optional(dev, "target"); + target_pwr = regulator_get(dev, "target"); if (!IS_ERR(target_pwr)) hpriv->target_pwrs[port] = target_pwr; @@ -436,16 +428,14 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev, hpriv->clks[i] = clk; } - hpriv->ahci_regulator = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "ahci"); + hpriv->ahci_regulator = devm_regulator_get(dev, "ahci"); if (IS_ERR(hpriv->ahci_regulator)) { rc = PTR_ERR(hpriv->ahci_regulator); - if (rc == -EPROBE_DEFER) + if (rc != 0) goto err_out; - rc = 0; - hpriv->ahci_regulator = NULL; } - hpriv->phy_regulator = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "phy"); + hpriv->phy_regulator = devm_regulator_get(dev, "phy"); if (IS_ERR(hpriv->phy_regulator)) { rc = PTR_ERR(hpriv->phy_regulator); if (rc == -EPROBE_DEFER) -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151