From 2640d7c0b8d5d9d9ee303b8cd09f5124176f6239 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 09:23:20 -0400 Subject: AHCI: Remove an unnecessary flush from ahci_qc_issue In an I/O heavy workload (IOZone), ahci_qc_issue is the second-highest consumer of CPU cycles. Removing the flush gets us approximately 10% bandwidth improvement. I believe this to be because the CPU can start queueing the next request instead of waiting for the readl() to flush the writes to the device. The flush isn't necessary because we're using a 'queue' metaphor; we don't guarantee the command has got to the device, nor do we need to guarantee the command has got to the controller. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/ahci.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/ahci.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c index 4ff3f03cf97b..dc7596f028b6 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c @@ -2136,7 +2136,6 @@ static unsigned int ahci_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) if (qc->tf.protocol == ATA_PROT_NCQ) writel(1 << qc->tag, port_mmio + PORT_SCR_ACT); writel(1 << qc->tag, port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE); - readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE); /* flush */ ahci_sw_activity(qc->dev->link); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151