From 59ecbbe7b31cd2d86ff9a9f461a00f7e7533aedc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:22:49 +0100 Subject: locking/barriers: Kill lockless_dereference() lockless_dereference() is a nice idea, but it gained little traction in kernel code since its introduction three years ago. This is partly because it's a pain to type, but also because using READ_ONCE() instead has worked correctly on all architectures apart from Alpha, which is a fully supported but somewhat niche architecture these days. Now that READ_ONCE() has been upgraded to contain an implicit smp_read_barrier_depends() and the few callers of lockless_dereference() have been converted, we can remove lockless_dereference() altogether. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508840570-22169-5-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/memory-barriers.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index b759a60624fd..470a682f3fa4 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt @@ -1886,18 +1886,6 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions: See Documentation/atomic_{t,bitops}.txt for more information. - (*) lockless_dereference(); - - This can be thought of as a pointer-fetch wrapper around the - smp_read_barrier_depends() data-dependency barrier. - - This is also similar to rcu_dereference(), but in cases where - object lifetime is handled by some mechanism other than RCU, for - example, when the objects removed only when the system goes down. - In addition, lockless_dereference() is used in some data structures - that can be used both with and without RCU. - - (*) dma_wmb(); (*) dma_rmb(); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151