From fb2a311a31d3457fe8c3ee16f5609877e2ead9f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:34:21 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns During review I noticed that the current logic for direct packet access marking in check_cond_jmp_op() has an off by one for the upper right range border when marking in find_good_pkt_pointers() with BPF_JLT and BPF_JLE. It's not really harmful given access up to pkt_end is always safe, but we should nevertheless correct the range marking before it becomes ABI. If pkt_data' denotes a pkt_data derived pointer (pkt_data + X), then for pkt_data' < pkt_end in the true branch as well as for pkt_end <= pkt_data' in the false branch we mark the range with X although it should really be X - 1 in these cases. For example, X could be pkt_end - pkt_data, then when testing for pkt_data' < pkt_end the verifier simulation cannot deduce that a byte load of pkt_data' - 1 would succeed in this branch. Fixes: b4e432f1000a ("bpf: enable BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE} opcodes in verifier") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 20f3889c006e..49cb5ad14746 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2430,12 +2430,15 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg) + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, + bool range_right_open) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; + u16 new_range; int i; - if (dst_reg->off < 0) + if (dst_reg->off < 0 || + (dst_reg->off == 0 && range_right_open)) /* This doesn't give us any range */ return; @@ -2446,9 +2449,13 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, */ return; - /* LLVM can generate four kind of checks: + new_range = dst_reg->off; + if (range_right_open) + new_range--; + + /* Examples for register markings: * - * Type 1/2: + * pkt_data in dst register: * * r2 = r3; * r2 += 8; @@ -2465,7 +2472,7 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, * r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0) * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0) * - * Type 3/4: + * pkt_data in src register: * * r2 = r3; * r2 += 8; @@ -2483,7 +2490,9 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0) * * Find register r3 and mark its range as r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8) - * so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) is safe to access. + * or r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8-1), so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) + * and [r3, r3 + 8-1) respectively is safe to access depending on + * the check. */ /* If our ids match, then we must have the same max_value. And we @@ -2494,14 +2503,14 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id) /* keep the maximum range already checked */ - regs[i].range = max_t(u16, regs[i].range, dst_reg->off); + regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range); for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) continue; reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id) - reg->range = max_t(u16, reg->range, dst_reg->off); + reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range); } } @@ -2865,19 +2874,19 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg); + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, false); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg); + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, true); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg]); + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], false); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg]); + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], true); } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg); return -EACCES; -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151 From 0fd4759c5515b7f2297d7fee5c45e5d9dd733001 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:34:22 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix pattern matches for direct packet access Alexander had a test program with direct packet access, where the access test was in the form of data + X > data_end. In an unrelated change to the program LLVM decided to swap the branches and emitted code for the test in form of data + X <= data_end. We hadn't seen these being generated previously, thus verifier would reject the program. Therefore, fix up the verifier to detect all test cases, so we don't run into such issues in the future. Fixes: b4e432f1000a ("bpf: enable BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE} opcodes in verifier") Reported-by: Alexander Alemayhu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 49cb5ad14746..c48ca2a34b5e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2874,18 +2874,42 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' > pkt_end */ find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, false); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end > pkt_data' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], true); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' < pkt_end */ find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, true); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end < pkt_data' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], false); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' >= pkt_end */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, true); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end >= pkt_data' */ find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], false); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' <= pkt_end */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, false); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end <= pkt_data' */ find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], true); } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg); -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151 From b37242c773b21edcd566e3bf995fb91d06b9537a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:34:23 +0200 Subject: bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests Lets add test cases to cover really all possible direct packet access tests for good/bad access cases so we keep tracking them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 480 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 480 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 50e15cedbb7f..64ae21f64489 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -6671,6 +6671,486 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end mangling, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end mangling, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.2.3-58-ga151